2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave absorption properties of one thin sheet employing carbonyl–iron powder and chlorinated polyethylene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the performance of FeCo-GNFs annealed at 450 • C and 600 • C are much better, especially the one at 450 • C, which shows the reflection loss of −30.6 dB at 7.4 GHz. More importantly, this absorbing peak locates in the lower frequency band (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8) and the maximum absorption is much stronger than that in the similar studies as reported previously [11][12][13][14]. According to the SEM and TEM results, the size of FeCo particles in the sample annealed at 450 • C is much smaller than in the one annealed at 600 • C. The average particle size of the sample with ratio of Fe:Co = 2:1 annealed at 450 • C is about 100 nm, while that of the sample annealed at 600 • C is over 200 nm.…”
Section: Microwave Absorbing Performancementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the performance of FeCo-GNFs annealed at 450 • C and 600 • C are much better, especially the one at 450 • C, which shows the reflection loss of −30.6 dB at 7.4 GHz. More importantly, this absorbing peak locates in the lower frequency band (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8) and the maximum absorption is much stronger than that in the similar studies as reported previously [11][12][13][14]. According to the SEM and TEM results, the size of FeCo particles in the sample annealed at 450 • C is much smaller than in the one annealed at 600 • C. The average particle size of the sample with ratio of Fe:Co = 2:1 annealed at 450 • C is about 100 nm, while that of the sample annealed at 600 • C is over 200 nm.…”
Section: Microwave Absorbing Performancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The usual radar frequency band locates at 2-18 GHz and it is usually difficult to obtain an effective absorption in the lower frequency range, especially in 2-4 GHz with thin coating thickness. In this range, some kinds of ferrites and Fe-based materials have demonstrated great absorbing performance [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. However, they still have some drawbacks, such as high density and requiring high mass filling percentages, which are usually over 60 wt%, or even 90 wt%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of CIP, Liu et al's study suggested that it could be applied as microwave absorbers in 2.0 ∼ 4.0 GHz, in which the absorbing properties of the materials were improved [17]. For an asphalt pavement structure, microwave heating depth can be calculated as formula (10)…”
Section: Reflectivity Of the Asphalt Mixes At Different Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can absorb and attenuate the incident electromagnetic waves, then crunch the electromagnetic energy into heat energy, or weaken the electromagnetic waves' interference. [8][9][10] Carbonyl iron powders and carbonyl nickel powders have been applied in the electronic industry as magnetic fillers due to their high saturation magnetization, superior stability, and enhanced dispersion. [11][12][13][14] Recently, it has been proved that the different morphology of carbonyl iron powder can influence the electromagnetic properties of the polymer filled with the powder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%