2021
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microvortex Generator Controlled Shock–Boundary Layer Interactions in Hypersonic Intake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Passive control) [105,121,[129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144] Very efficient in suppressing the separated shear layer by energizing the incoming boundary layer through vortices.…”
Section: Mvgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Passive control) [105,121,[129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144] Very efficient in suppressing the separated shear layer by energizing the incoming boundary layer through vortices.…”
Section: Mvgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that the higher injection of fluid into the incoming boundary layer promotes the SBLI to such an extent which cannot be reduced by the favorable effect of shock strength reduction. In a subsequent study, Jana et al (2021) examined the effect of an array of Micro Vortex Generators (MVGs) of varied heights separately deployed at two different locations at Mach 5.7 [144]. The MVGs of height 0.7 mm deployed upstream of the interaction region are the most effective in reducing the separation bubble size.…”
Section: Plasma Jets (Active Control) [98-102]mentioning
confidence: 99%