2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microvascular Decompression versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Single-Institution Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 23 ] Careful preoperative comorbidity and frailty assessment[ 23 ] are necessary. Some studies reported that MVD could provide better long-term pain relief and less facial sensory complication than gamma knife[ 13 , 14 , 31 , 38 ] and rhizotomy. [ 10 , 16 ] A single study demonstrated that complication-related HRQoL was more common in patients treated with rhizotomy than MVD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 23 ] Careful preoperative comorbidity and frailty assessment[ 23 ] are necessary. Some studies reported that MVD could provide better long-term pain relief and less facial sensory complication than gamma knife[ 13 , 14 , 31 , 38 ] and rhizotomy. [ 10 , 16 ] A single study demonstrated that complication-related HRQoL was more common in patients treated with rhizotomy than MVD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 , 19 ] SRS, a less invasive procedure that lacks the surgical risks of MVD (facial numbness/palsy, cerebrospinal fluid leaks, hearing deficits, and incisional infections), may be offered to older patients who are poor surgical candidates due to comorbidities. [ 10 , 17 , 19 , 24 ] When evaluated retrospectively, MVD has been reported to be superior to SRS with a significantly higher health-related quality of life, higher initial cure rate, lower rate of recurrence and complications, complete pain relief, durability of response, and preservation of trigeminal sensation. [ 17 , 33 ] However, most patients who undergo SRS are either not candidates for MVD or have recurrent pain after MVD, usually several years later.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 10 , 17 , 19 , 24 ] When evaluated retrospectively, MVD has been reported to be superior to SRS with a significantly higher health-related quality of life, higher initial cure rate, lower rate of recurrence and complications, complete pain relief, durability of response, and preservation of trigeminal sensation. [ 17 , 33 ] However, most patients who undergo SRS are either not candidates for MVD or have recurrent pain after MVD, usually several years later. Pain relief from SRS is related to the radiation dose delivered to the postganglionic intracranial nerve, with increased rates of pain relief with higher doses (usually between 80 and 90 Gy).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%