2002
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.10196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microtubulin configuration and mitochondrial distribution after ultra‐rapid cooling of bovine oocytes

Abstract: Considerable attention has been focused on the cryopreservation of mammalian oocytes, as a consequence of poor development of cryopreserved bovine oocytes in vitro, in order to enhance the application of genetic engineering. Experiments were carried out to evaluate the viability and ultra-structural changes of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ultra rapid cooling methods. Oocytes that had been allowed to mature for 22 hr were exposed to a mixture of cryoprotectants (3.2 M ethylene glycol, 2.36 M dimethyl sulfoxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
49
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(53 reference statements)
6
49
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These oocytes were incubated for 15 min in 400 nM Mito-tracker green (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR), washed in PBS for 10 min, and then mounted on a Teflon slide for evaluation of mitochondrial distribution by epifluorescence microscopy. Distributions were classified and recorded for each oocyte as normal (homogenous distribution throughout the cytoplasm) or abnormal (centered or heterogeneous distribution in the cytoplasm; Rho et al, 2002;Fulka et al, 2004).…”
Section: Assessment Of Mitochondrial Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These oocytes were incubated for 15 min in 400 nM Mito-tracker green (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR), washed in PBS for 10 min, and then mounted on a Teflon slide for evaluation of mitochondrial distribution by epifluorescence microscopy. Distributions were classified and recorded for each oocyte as normal (homogenous distribution throughout the cytoplasm) or abnormal (centered or heterogeneous distribution in the cytoplasm; Rho et al, 2002;Fulka et al, 2004).…”
Section: Assessment Of Mitochondrial Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structure of the GV chromatin strongly influences successful nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation in vitro as demonstrated in mouse (Miyara et al, 2003), mare (Choi et al, 2006), and cow studies. Likewise, cytoplasmic mitochondrial distribution within the immature oocyte (also reflecting the microfilament organization) plays a critical role in driving later embryo development (Wang et al, 2000;Stojkovic et al, 2001;Rho et al, 2002;Van Blerkom et al, 2002;Velilla et al, 2006). Because GV chromatin structure and mitochondrial distribution may both be influenced by non uniform shrinking or swelling of an oocyte exposed to an anisosmotic solution, these two targets of interest were chosen as indicators of developmental competence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Developmental arrest was observed more frequently in vitrified group than fresh control group ( Table 1), suggesting that oocyte activation by sperm penetration was suboptimal in the vitrified-warmed oocytes. Vitrification induced the reduction of maturation promoting factor (MPF) in ovine oocytes before fertilization [34], the damage of mitochondria in bovine oocytes [35], and of endoplasmic reticulum in mouse oocytes [36]. Post-warm oocytes may have been recovered by 2-h culture prior to IVF in the present study, but the harmful effect of remaining intracellular CPA (EG and/or DMSO) could not be estimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…A significant DNA fragmentation has been found in vitrified bovine oocytes [38]. It has been reported that the process of oocyte vitrification can induce profound modifications to mitochondria, cortical granules, microvilli, oolemma, smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER) and cytoskeleton [39][40][41][42][43]. Therefore, taken together, it appears that the quality of blastocysts is detrimentally affected by both maternal reproductive age and vitrification/ warming procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%