2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microtubule Nucleation in Mitosis by a RanGTP-Dependent Protein Complex

Abstract: The XRHAMM-γTuRC complex is the target for activation by RanGTP that promotes an interaction between TPX2 and XRHAMM. The resulting TPX2-RHAMM-γTuRC supracomplex fulfills the two essential requirements for the activation of MT nucleation by RanGTP: NEDD1 phosphorylation on S405 by the TPX2-activated Aurora A and the recruitment of the complex onto a TPX2-dependent scaffold. Our data identify TPX2 as the only direct RanGTP target and NEDD1 as the only Aurora A substrate essential for the activation of the RanGT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
97
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
97
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this notion, the regulatory factors NEDD1 and CDK5RAP2 have a significantly higher turnover rate compared to the γTuRC structural core subunits γ-tubulin, GCP2, GCP3, GCP4, GCP5 and GCP6 (Jakobsen et al, 2011). Moreover, NEDD1 is phosphorylated at multiple sites to specifically control γTuRC function in distinct mitotic nucleation pathways (Gomez-Ferreria et al, 2012;Haren et al, 2009;Johmura et al, 2011;Lüders et al, 2006;Pinyol et al, 2013;Scrofani et al, 2015;Sdelci et al, 2012;Teixidó-Travesa et al, 2010. Future work will show whether human MZT1 is subject to similar regulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Consistent with this notion, the regulatory factors NEDD1 and CDK5RAP2 have a significantly higher turnover rate compared to the γTuRC structural core subunits γ-tubulin, GCP2, GCP3, GCP4, GCP5 and GCP6 (Jakobsen et al, 2011). Moreover, NEDD1 is phosphorylated at multiple sites to specifically control γTuRC function in distinct mitotic nucleation pathways (Gomez-Ferreria et al, 2012;Haren et al, 2009;Johmura et al, 2011;Lüders et al, 2006;Pinyol et al, 2013;Scrofani et al, 2015;Sdelci et al, 2012;Teixidó-Travesa et al, 2010. Future work will show whether human MZT1 is subject to similar regulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We speculate that because TPX2 has been reported to have two domains that can bind to microtubules (Trieselmann et al, 2003;Vos et al, 2008), it can perhaps bind to two tubulin dimers simultaneously to strengthen the bond between them. Alternatively, oligomerization of TPX2 could allow for binding of two tubulin dimers simultaneously, thereby strengthening the bond between the tubulin dimers (Drechsler et al, 2014;Scrofani et al, 2015). We note that microtubule-associated proteins that exclusively bind to a single subunit in the microtubule lattice, such as a kinesin motor domain, might be less likely to stabilize the bonds between two adjacent tubulin subunits in the lattice, and would thus lack the ability to suppress the off-rate of tubulin subunits from the microtubule tip, even if the protein were to coat the entire microtubule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1D) is that TPX2 reduces the effective tubulin concentration in solution by sequestering free tubulin into multi-subunit complexes (Gruss et al, 2002;Roostalu et al, 2015;Scrofani et al, 2015). If this is the case, suppressed tubulin subunit on-rates could be an indirect consequence of enhanced formation of tubulin-TPX2 nucleation complexes (Fygenson et al, 1995;Schek et al, 2007;Scrofani et al, 2015). To test this idea, reaction mixtures with and without 50 nM of TPX2, each containing 10 μM of Alexa-Fluor-488-conjugated tubulin with 0.6 mM GTP, were incubated in a tube at 37°C, and then small samples were removed after 5, 20 and 60 min.…”
Section: Tpx2 Slows Tubulin Subunit Off-rates During Microtubule Assementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This startling discovery made symmetrical sense from a nucleation point of view in that γ-TuRC ring complexes were first discovered at the poles of the spindle and act there as the microtubule-nucleating components of the centrosomes. RanGTP has also been found to be present at both kinetochores and centrosomes [34,36,42,45,46]. Importantly, the presence of RanGTP at the kinetochore is vital for Nup107–160/γ-TuRC-microtubule nucleation and counteracts the effects of importin beta (Figure 2A) [42,45,47].…”
Section: Nuclear Pore Proteins Act In Spindle Microtubule Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%