2016
DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2016.1172158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microtubule nucleation and organization in dendrites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis indicated that the method performs well at a range of <15 MTs/pixel, after which it fails to extract correct parameters. This provides a rough estimate as to which neurons, besides C. elegans motor neuron, the method can be used for (Bray and Bunge, 1981; Burton, 1987; Chalfie and Thomson, 1982; Delandre et al, 2016; Yu and Baas, 1994). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis indicated that the method performs well at a range of <15 MTs/pixel, after which it fails to extract correct parameters. This provides a rough estimate as to which neurons, besides C. elegans motor neuron, the method can be used for (Bray and Bunge, 1981; Burton, 1987; Chalfie and Thomson, 1982; Delandre et al, 2016; Yu and Baas, 1994). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility is that local MT nucleation events occur in dendrites, via gamma-tubulin and Golgi outposts that introduce minus-end-out MTs (Nguyen et al, 2014, Delandre et al, 2016). This is probably not the primary mechanism, however, because the presence of Golgi elements in dendrites requires that at least some minus-end-out MTs are already present (Baas et al, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microtubule polarity, however, varies within the dendritic arbors of da neurons (Stone et al, 2008), and it is possible that Golgi outposts are nevertheless sufficient to locally influence microtubule polarity as previously reported (Delandre et al, 2016;Ori-McKenney et al, 2012;Yalgin et al, 2015). To test the idea that outposts have the capacity to affect microtubule polarity, we used a paradigm in which Golgi outposts are ectopically localized to axons, a compartment from which outposts are normally excluded and in which microtubules are uniformly oriented with their plus-ends distal.…”
Section: Loss Of Gm130 Significantly Reduces Misoriented Microtubulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies using fluorescently tagged End-binding 1 (EB1::GFP), which marks growing microtubule ends, Golgi outposts have been shown to correlate with microtubule growth initiation sites in developing dendrites (Ori-McKenney et al, 2012;Yalgin et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2014). This correlation has led to the model that Golgi outposts function as MTOCs that support acentrosomal nucleation and the directional growth of microtubules during dendrite branch formation (Delandre et al, 2016). Decreasing the levels of proteins involved in microtubule nucleation, such as γ-tubulin and its interactors centrosomin (cnn, the fly ortholog of CDK5RAP2) and pericentrin-like protein (plp, the Drosophila ortholog of AKAP450), disrupts the correlation between microtubule growth initiation sites and outposts and perturbs dendrite branch growth (Ori-McKenney et al, 2012;Yalgin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%