2011
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.257865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microtubule Affinity Regulating Kinase Activity in Living Neurons Was Examined by a Genetically Encoded Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer/Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging-based Biosensor

Abstract: Background: Deregulation of the protein kinase MARK has been linked to Alzheimer disease. Results: Mark-specific inhibitors and a biosensor are identified. Conclusion:The inhibitors and the biosensor are tools to provide new insights into the role of MARK during polarity establishment and maintenance of neurons. Significance: The inhibitors might possess therapeutic potential by interfering with abnormal Tau phosphorylation in Alzheimer disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A second compound with higher IC 50 for DYRK1B but with no specificity for CLK kinases NCGC00185984 was not as active in blocking NKX3.1 degradation. A MARK2 inhibitor, 39621, was used because MARK2 was one of the kinases identified in the second round kinome library screening (24). Compound 39621 was substantially less active as an inhibitor of NKX3.1 degradation than the DYRK1B inhibitors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second compound with higher IC 50 for DYRK1B but with no specificity for CLK kinases NCGC00185984 was not as active in blocking NKX3.1 degradation. A MARK2 inhibitor, 39621, was used because MARK2 was one of the kinases identified in the second round kinome library screening (24). Compound 39621 was substantially less active as an inhibitor of NKX3.1 degradation than the DYRK1B inhibitors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.1a); however, the upstream events activating these signaling cascades have not been clarified (Timm et al 2003(Timm et al , 2008a. The protein structure of the kinase domain with the UBA domain has been determined for MARK1, MARK2, and MARK3 Marx et al 2006;Murphy et al 2007), and a candidate for a PAR-1-specific inhibitor has also been reported (Timm et al 2011). It is also noteworthy that CagA, the toxin of Helicobacter pylori, has been shown to inhibit PAR-1 kinase activity by specifically binding to the substrate-binding pocket of the kinase domain (Nesic et al 2010).…”
Section: Essential Features Of Par-1mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Further enhancement of the dynamic range could facilitate this important application in cellular context to complement FRET-based inhibitor screens using synthetic sensors outside of the cellular context (e.g., Gratz et al, 2011). Another application of the genetically encoded sensors where we expect to see further advancement is inhibitor candidate validation (e.g., Timm et al, 2011), including validation of inhibitors’ isoform specificity (Tsalkova et al, 2012), and analysis of pharmacokinetics in in vitro or in vivo models (Nobis et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%