2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microtransplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the allogeneic transplant setting, HLA matching paired with pre-transplant myeloablation reduces the risk of graft rejection, and post-transplant immunosuppression can prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Notably, UCB for transplantation with the end goal of HSC engraftment is entirely different from UCB infusions [13], particularly for neurological conditions where the goal is immunomodulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the allogeneic transplant setting, HLA matching paired with pre-transplant myeloablation reduces the risk of graft rejection, and post-transplant immunosuppression can prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Notably, UCB for transplantation with the end goal of HSC engraftment is entirely different from UCB infusions [13], particularly for neurological conditions where the goal is immunomodulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And 7 patients of the mean age 31.3 years old got microtransplantaion without significant GVHD ( 11 ). However, safety and effectiveness of microtransplantation are still under dispute and need to be evaluated in large randomized clinical trials ( 16 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, only 23 records could be identified and only 5 papers could be included. On the other hand, few identified records [68,69] and very few [70][71][72][73][74] or no [75,76] included studies are not unusual in systematic reviews. Also, the included papers have a relatively low level of evidence (CS design) and moreover 1 paper [36] used only a small convenient sample of a major city and 3 papers [38][39][40] are only representatives of a medium-sized city.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%