2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2017293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microthermal sensors for determining fluid composition and flow rate in fluidic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At a very low flow rate, the sensitivity is nearly independent of the position and corresponds to the sensitivity for undisturbed flow of approx. 0.2 K % −1 , which is comparable to earlier results using similar microheaters in a stopped fluid (Schmitt et al, 2013a). With increasing flow rate, the sensitivity initially decreases for all heaters.…”
Section: Measurement Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At a very low flow rate, the sensitivity is nearly independent of the position and corresponds to the sensitivity for undisturbed flow of approx. 0.2 K % −1 , which is comparable to earlier results using similar microheaters in a stopped fluid (Schmitt et al, 2013a). With increasing flow rate, the sensitivity initially decreases for all heaters.…”
Section: Measurement Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Regarding the influence of the flow rate on the length of the vortices for water and assuming a linear correlation, an increase from 1.19 mm at 0.06 mL s −1 to 2.47 mm at 0.1 mL s −1 is observed, resulting in a sensitivity of 32 mm (mL s −1 ) −1 . In a previous work, Schmitt et al (2013a) showed that using the proposed time-of-flight measurement principle for determination of the flow rate achieved a measurement uncertainty of less than 1.34 µL s −1 in the flow rate range between 0.027 and 0.055 mL s −1 which is relevant for DMFCs. Using error propagation, this results in a measurement uncertainty of the volume fraction of approx.…”
Section: Measurement Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations