2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10339-005-0003-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microswitch programs for persons with multiple disabilities: an overview of the responses adopted for microswitch activation

Abstract: The results showed that 151 of the 190 participants involved in the studies had a positive outcome (i.e., clear increases in their responding, which suggested that they had learned the association between responding and consequent preferred stimuli). Failures were largely concentrated in the first group of studies. The discussion focused on (a) the importance of selecting plausible responses for increasing the chances of success, (b) the need of non-typical responses for persons with minimal motor behavior, (c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, research into switch-based training programmes has explored how the presentation of preferred stimuli can lead to the emergence of contingency awareness (Lancioni, Singh, O'Reilly, & Oliva, 2005), and the purpose of some behavioural interventions is to support the development of communication, such as indicating choice (Lancioni et al, 2007).…”
Section: Research In the Pmld Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, research into switch-based training programmes has explored how the presentation of preferred stimuli can lead to the emergence of contingency awareness (Lancioni, Singh, O'Reilly, & Oliva, 2005), and the purpose of some behavioural interventions is to support the development of communication, such as indicating choice (Lancioni et al, 2007).…”
Section: Research In the Pmld Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, a program matching those typically used for promoting constructive engagement through motivating (reinforcing) stimulation was here engineered to enhance the control of chin wetness by a person with multiple disabilities (Lancioni, Singh, O'Reilly, & Oliva, 2005). The person had no practicable responses in his repertoire to deal with such a problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative strategy, which has been applied in recent studies, involves the use of small, atypical responses, e.g., eyelid, forehead, and lip movements (cf. Lancioni, et al, 2005;. These types of responses in fact may be more plausible for the person to control and still amenable to microswitch or VOCA technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feasible responses are not necessarily easy to find, however, when the person's motor condition presents with extensive paralysis or massive spasticity. One way to deal with these conditions is to select marginal and atypical expressions, such as eyelid, lip, and forehead movements, as responses that the person may more easily control (Lancioni, Singh, O'Reilly, & Oliva, 2005;. Another approach may be to identify variations within any conventional motor scheme that might still be available and use these variations as different responses (Lancioni, Olivetti Belardinelli, Stasolla, Singh, O'Reilly, Sigafoos, et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%