1983
DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90203-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsurgical analysis of the clonal age and the cell-cycle stage required for the onset of autogamy in Paramecium tetraurelia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, maintenance of the ability to produce the 0 factor production seems to depend on the rounds of DNA synthesis but not on the absolute time. A similar hypothesis has been postulated for the timing of the clonal age at which autogamy can be induced [19]. As was mentioned above, it has been assumed that the E cytoplasmic factor determines the new postzygotic macronuclei in the first cell cycle, 10-11 hr after the sensitive period of macronuclear origin from a product of the synkaryon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Accordingly, maintenance of the ability to produce the 0 factor production seems to depend on the rounds of DNA synthesis but not on the absolute time. A similar hypothesis has been postulated for the timing of the clonal age at which autogamy can be induced [19]. As was mentioned above, it has been assumed that the E cytoplasmic factor determines the new postzygotic macronuclei in the first cell cycle, 10-11 hr after the sensitive period of macronuclear origin from a product of the synkaryon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Commitment of the cell to autogamy (uniparental self-fertilization), during which the micronuclei undergo meiosis, is made in two steps upon nutritional down-shift (Mikami & Koizumi, 1983;Berger, 1986). Commitment of the cell to autogamy (uniparental self-fertilization), during which the micronuclei undergo meiosis, is made in two steps upon nutritional down-shift (Mikami & Koizumi, 1983;Berger, 1986).…”
Section: ( I ) the Cell Cycle Boundary Is Not A Developmental Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation with commitment to sexual development is similar. Commitment of the cell to autogamy (uniparental self-fertilization), during which the micronuclei undergo meiosis, is made in two steps upon nutritional down-shift (Mikami & Koizumi, 1983;. The initial commitment occurs at about 0.75 of the preceding cell cycle, prior to cytokinesis (the pre-autogamous cell fission).…”
Section: ( I ) the Cell Cycle Boundary Is Not A Developmental Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its duration expressed as the number of fissions (SMITH-SONNEBORN & REED 1976), is a stable and characteristic trait for species and even for stocks (KOOECIUSZKO & PRA-JER 1988;PRAJER & KOOECIUSZKO 1999). This trait is genetically controlled by the macronucleus and can be experimentally accelerated (MIKAMI & KOIZUMI 1983;KOOECIUSZKO & PRAJER 1989). The isolation of mutants with a short period of autogamous immaturity (TAKAGI et al 1987(TAKAGI et al , 1989 as well as with a long one (KOMORI et al 2004) confirmed the role of the macronucleus in the regulation of IAI duration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%