2017
DOI: 10.3791/56498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructured Devices for Optimized Microinjection and Imaging of Zebrafish Larvae

Abstract: Zebrafish have emerged as a powerful model of various human diseases and a useful tool for an increasing range of experimental studies, spanning fundamental developmental biology through to large-scale genetic and chemical screens. However, many experiments, especially those related to infection and xenograft models, rely on microinjection and imaging of embryos and larvae, which are laborious techniques that require skill and expertise. To improve the precision and throughput of current microinjection techniq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Irradiated spores still stained well with calcofluor. For intravascular delivery experiments, microinjection of conidia utilised polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microstructured surface arrays [ 93 ], while imaging was performed following mounting in PDMS imaging devices, as previously described [ 94 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irradiated spores still stained well with calcofluor. For intravascular delivery experiments, microinjection of conidia utilised polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microstructured surface arrays [ 93 ], while imaging was performed following mounting in PDMS imaging devices, as previously described [ 94 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FPR1 sensitivity has been shown to vary widely between mammalian species, with mouse and rat neutrophils exhibiting poor recruitment in response to fMLP compared to human cells (29). There is evidence that zebrafish neutrophils do respond to formylated peptides (30, 31), although experiments in this model have been complicated by inability to distinguish direct responses to chemoattractant from recruitment to injured tissue at the site of microinjection. To avoid this complication in our experiments, we delivered pre-treated conidia at one site (the duct of Cuvier) and analyzed neutrophil responses at a spatially distant site (the caudal venous plexus) (Figure 5Ai).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable better measurement of neutrophil-specific responses, primitive macrophage differentiation was restricted by blocking translation of spi1 or irf8 using anti-sense morpholino oligonucleotides ( spi1 -MO) as previously described (34, 38). The morphant larvae were raised to 2 days post-fertilization, and then microinjected into the vasculature with a solution of A. fumigatus conidia pre-stained with Calcofluor together with C-001 (10 nM), C-016 (100 nM), or DMSO, using microstructured surface arrays developed for this purpose (31, 45). Imaging was performed on a fully automated Nikon TiE microscope.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microfluidic device breaks through the limitations of conventional methods such as significantly reducing the damage to fish and no need for anesthetics while observing the zebrafish. This significantly reduces the cost of the inspection, and easy for drug administration to inspect the development of organs in zebrafish with a higher survival rate 17 19 . In this context microfluidic technologies enact a promising direction that can support the development of the next-generation systems for phenotype-based physiological analysis 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%