Superalloys 2016 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781119075646.ch66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure‐Sensitive Model for Predicting Surface Residual Stress Relaxation and Redistribution in a P/M Nickel‐Base Superalloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,16,17 Comparatively, the two material orientations undergo linear hardening at room temperature; however, at 650 C, the longitudinal columnar-grained response exhibits the appearance of perfectly plastic or heterogeneous slip immediately after yielding, after which the material begins to gradually strain-harden under multi-slip conditions. Near-identical tensile behaviors have been reported for fine-grained Inconel 100 18 and single-crystal CMSX-2 19 in the intermediate temperature regime. Figure 9 shows the fracture surfaces of the columnar-grained material at room temperature and 650 C. Different fracture mechanisms can be observed between the two material orientations.…”
Section: Mechanical Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…9,16,17 Comparatively, the two material orientations undergo linear hardening at room temperature; however, at 650 C, the longitudinal columnar-grained response exhibits the appearance of perfectly plastic or heterogeneous slip immediately after yielding, after which the material begins to gradually strain-harden under multi-slip conditions. Near-identical tensile behaviors have been reported for fine-grained Inconel 100 18 and single-crystal CMSX-2 19 in the intermediate temperature regime. Figure 9 shows the fracture surfaces of the columnar-grained material at room temperature and 650 C. Different fracture mechanisms can be observed between the two material orientations.…”
Section: Mechanical Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The cutting force causes uneven plastic deformation of the surface layer of the workpiece. This is manifested in two ways: a "plastic protrusion" effect in the front area of the tool contact point; a "squeezing effect" caused by the tool flank [20]. The former causes residual tensile stress on the machined surface; the latter produces residual compressive stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%