2018
DOI: 10.1175/jpo-d-18-0028.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure Observations of Turbulent Heat Fluxes in a Warm-Core Canada Basin Eddy

Abstract: An intrahalocline eddy was observed on the Chukchi slope in September of 2015 using both towed CTD and microstructure temperature and shear sections. The core of the eddy was 6°C, significantly warmer than the surrounding −1°C water and far exceeding typical temperatures of warm-core Arctic eddies. Microstructure sections indicated that outside of the eddy the rate of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy ε was quite low . However, at the edges of the eddy core, ε was elevated to . Three different processes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
83
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
15
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we present the analysis of observations collected during the first glider mission in an anticyclonic LCE (“Poseidon”; Meunier et al, 2018) in fall 2016. Double diffusion processes are common attributes of eddies in the ocean (Bebieva & Timmermans, 2016; Fine et al, 2018), and our findings indicate that LCEs are not an exception.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Here, we present the analysis of observations collected during the first glider mission in an anticyclonic LCE (“Poseidon”; Meunier et al, 2018) in fall 2016. Double diffusion processes are common attributes of eddies in the ocean (Bebieva & Timmermans, 2016; Fine et al, 2018), and our findings indicate that LCEs are not an exception.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Mesoscale eddies are commonly observed in the Arctic Ocean via field campaigns (D'Asaro, ; Hunkins, ; Padman et al, ; Pickart, ), from drifting ice‐tethered profilers (Timmermans et al, ; Zhao et al, , ) and moorings (Zhao et al, ; Zhao & Timmermans, ), as well as in microstructure observations in Canada Basin (Fine et al, ). Depending on their geographic location and depth in the water column, there is a multitude of possible eddy formation mechanisms in the Arctic including baroclinic and barotropic instabilities of mean flows including boundary currents (D'Asaro, ; Johannessen et al, ; Manley & Hunkins, ; Spall et al, ); convection‐driven eddies in, for example, leads of polynyas (Muench et al, ); instabilities of outcropping surface fronts (Manucharyan & Timmermans, ); mixed layer instabilities of meltwater fronts (Lu, ; Manucharyan & Thompson, ); and wind‐driven eddy formation over ice‐edge boundaries (Johannessen et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an inverse method and repeat hydrographic measurements between 2003 and 2015, Dosser and Timmermans () estimated along‐isopycnal diffusivity in the Canada Basin to be 300–600 m 2 s −1 . Using high‐resolution measurements from an intrahalocline eddy on the Chukchi slope, Fine et al () quantified contribution of different processes to the heat loss of the eddy. At the top edge of the eddy, double diffusion led to an upward heat flux of 5 W m −2 , at the bottom edge shear‐driven mixing generated a downward heat flux of 0.5 W m −2 , and along the sides density‐compensated thermohaline intrusions transported 2,000 W m −2 laterally out of the eddy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%