2019
DOI: 10.3390/met9121330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure, Micro-Indentation, and Scratch Behavior of Cr Films Prepared on Al alloys by Using Magnetron Sputtering

Abstract: In this study, closed-field unbalanced magnetron sputtering (CFUMS) was employed to deposit pure Cr films on soft substrate of 2024 Al alloy. The effects of deposition powers and biases on the microstructures and mechanical performance of Cr films were systematically investigated by using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), micro-indentation and scratch test. Results showed that all the Cr films had a strong (110) preferred orientation and anisotropic surface morphology with columnar s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sample i (Cu/PI) serves as a reference, and its ε̅ value is 1.00. Poly­(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and Cr were chosen as interlayers for Sample ii (Cu/PMMA/PI) and Sample iii (Cu/Cr/PI), respectively, because they are widely used as interfacial materials in many electronic devices yet exhibit significant differences in the elasto-plastic properties. PMMA represents a soft ( E = 4.2 ± 0.8 GPa) yet elastic interlayer (ε Y = 3.4%), while Cr represents a stiff ( E = 265 ± 15 GPa) yet brittle interlayer (ε Y = 0.9%). The ε̅ values of Samples ii and iii are 0.97 and 1.01, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample i (Cu/PI) serves as a reference, and its ε̅ value is 1.00. Poly­(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and Cr were chosen as interlayers for Sample ii (Cu/PMMA/PI) and Sample iii (Cu/Cr/PI), respectively, because they are widely used as interfacial materials in many electronic devices yet exhibit significant differences in the elasto-plastic properties. PMMA represents a soft ( E = 4.2 ± 0.8 GPa) yet elastic interlayer (ε Y = 3.4%), while Cr represents a stiff ( E = 265 ± 15 GPa) yet brittle interlayer (ε Y = 0.9%). The ε̅ values of Samples ii and iii are 0.97 and 1.01, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, PVD technology is one of the most effective technologies for surface modification in surface engineering, and it is also one of the most promising alternative processes for chromium plating [16,17]. The coatings prepared by PVD technology have characteristics of high hardness, good wear resistance, low friction coefficient, dense tissue structure, and strong bonding with the substrate [18,19]. Besides, the prepared coatings have low surface roughness and generally do not require secondary polishing treatment, providing an ideal solution for small shaped parts that are difficult to polish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%