Microstructure Evolution during Hot Deformation of UNS S32750 Super-Duplex Stainless Steel Alloy

Abstract

The present paper analyzes UNS S32750 Super-Duplex Stainless Steel hot deformation behavior during processing by upsetting. The objective of this paper is to determine the optimum range of deformation temperatures, considering that both austenite and ferrite have different deformation behaviors due to their different morphology, physical, and mechanical properties. Because the capability of plastic deformation accommodation of ferrite is reduced when compared to austenite, side cracks and fissures can form during the hot deformation process. Consequently, it is important to find the optimum conditions of deformation of this type of stainless steel to establish the best processing parameters without deteriorating the material. The experimental program involved the application of hot deformation by the upsetting method on a series of samples between 1000 °C and 1275 °C, with a total degree of deformation of 30%. The resultant samples were examined by SEM-EBSD to establish and analyze the evolution of the phases present in the structure from several points of view: nature, distribution, morphology (size and shape), and their structural homogeneity. The GROD (Grain Reference Orientation Deviation) distribution map was also determined while taking into account the possible precipitation of the secondary austenite phase (γ2-phase) and the analysis of the dynamic recrystallization process according to the applied deformation temperature. The main conclusion was that UNS S32750 SDSS steel can be safely deformed by upsetting between 1050–1275 °C, with an experimented total degree of deformation of 30%.

Effect of Temperature on S32750 Duplex Steel Welded Joint Impact Toughness

“…Microstructures of DSS have also been analysed in respect to deformation processes, including electro-plastic effects, [ 19 ], hot deformation, [ 20 ], and numerical simulations of DIC-measured strains [ 21 ]. An investigation of the electro-plastic effect on four different DSSs was performed and presented in [ 19 ], characterised by optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and tensile properties (tensile strength, total elongation, uniform elongation, and yield stress).…”

“…An investigation of the electro-plastic effect on four different DSSs was performed and presented in [ 19 ], characterised by optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and tensile properties (tensile strength, total elongation, uniform elongation, and yield stress). In an investigation presented in [ 20 ], the optimum range of deformation temperature (considering that both austenite and ferrite have different deformation behaviours due to their different morphological, physical, and mechanical properties) was determined. Local strain distribution in duplex stainless steel during tension, as obtained using the digital image correlation (DIC) technique, was presented in [ 21 ], with a finite element inversion of nanoindentation experiments on austenitic and ferrite phases in duplex stainless steel carried out to obtain the stress–strain response of the two phases.…”

Hot Deformation and Microstructure Evolution of Metallic Materials

“…The addition of molybdenum suppressed DRX and ensured the formation of fully martensitic microstructures. Cojocaru et al [ 15 ] analyzed the hot deformation behavior of UNS S32750 Super-Duplex Stainless Steel during processing by upsetting. The resulting samples were examined by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) to establish the evolution of the phases present in the structure from several points of view: nature, distribution, morphology (size and shape), and their structural homogeneity.…”