2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure difference between core and skin of T700 carbon fibers in heat-treated carbon/carbon composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the greater and stiffer graphitic crystals and the reduction of interlayer spacing, the void size increases. A general decrease of micro porosity in the fibre structure with a pronounced development of voids in the fibre skin structure opposite to the core is observed .…”
Section: Process‐structure‐relations and Their Technical Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the greater and stiffer graphitic crystals and the reduction of interlayer spacing, the void size increases. A general decrease of micro porosity in the fibre structure with a pronounced development of voids in the fibre skin structure opposite to the core is observed .…”
Section: Process‐structure‐relations and Their Technical Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Temperatures of 1400 °C and above result in graphitic fibres with less content of nitrogen or hydrogen . Because the highly graphitic carbon fibres is formed by the temperature increase, crystallite thickness size and orientation increases and the interlayer spacing between the single graphene planes are reduced . The enhanced crystal growth is different for the single crystallite dimensions.…”
Section: Process‐structure‐relations and Their Technical Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El-Bakary and Ali [17] reported the optical and geometrical properties of fibers with skin-core structure. Zhou et al [18] studied the microstructure difference between core and skin of T700 carbon fibers in heat-treated carbon/carbon composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular methods to determine microcrystalline structure of carbon materials are Raman spectroscopy [5−7] , X-ray diffraction (XRD) [5,8] , and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) [4,9] . With the development of the technology of small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) [10,11] , theory and method using SAXS for the characterization of the microvoids in carbon fibers have also been established and developed in the last twenty years [10, 12−15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%