2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure-based finite element analysis of failure prediction in particle-reinforced metal–matrix composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, 5% TiN composites do not exhibit good agreement with other methods. This is due to the presence of relatively more porosity (Figure 1), which has not been considered in any of the above theories (Equations (7)- (15)). Convective and radiative heat transfer losses are neglected which are also affect the thermal conductivity of composites at high temperature.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 5% TiN composites do not exhibit good agreement with other methods. This is due to the presence of relatively more porosity (Figure 1), which has not been considered in any of the above theories (Equations (7)- (15)). Convective and radiative heat transfer losses are neglected which are also affect the thermal conductivity of composites at high temperature.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, micromechanical finite element models have been used to understand the local mechanics and mechanisms governing the macroscopic behavior of heterogeneous materials. [34][35][36][37][38][39] These models provided some good information on the overall behavior of the heterogeneous materials based on the known properties of their constituents and the detailed interactions among them. Still, most of the studies did not consider the ultimate ductile failure of DP steels, and only a few examined the failure of these complex steels by developing phenomenological failure criteria for prescribed failure mode and intentional critical loading planes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, most of the studies did not consider the ultimate ductile failure of DP steels, and only a few examined the failure of these complex steels by developing phenomenological failure criteria for prescribed failure mode and intentional critical loading planes. [38,39] It is generally accepted that ductile fracture strongly depends on the microstructure, voids, inclusions, and microcracks in the material. [40] Ductile materials typically exhibit localized deformation before final fracture, and many multiscale models have been proposed for use in studying the ductile failure and fracture phenomenon in such materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the study of micromechanics made it possible to predict the material's properties as a function of constituent properties and local conditions [14]. As a result, the optimization of a composite's mechanical properties for different applications is based on the understanding of the relationship between the microstructure and their effects on the composite's macroscopic response to the applied load [15]. Micromechanics of composites include: properties of the constituent materials, reinforcement size and geometry, reinforcement volume fraction, reinforcement-to-matrix interfacial adhesion, and reinforcement spatial distribution [14] [16]- [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%