2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure and shearing strength of stainless steel/low carbon steel joints produced by resistance spot welding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Naturally, correlations get better and better, the narrower the sheet thickness and material range e.g., Rajarajan et al [33] predicted very accurately the STS, CTS, HV nugget values of RSWed DP800 steel sheets. Good estimations can be made with numerical [34][35][36][37][38] and finite element (FEM) simulations [39][40][41][42][43], machine learning [44], and artificial neural networks [45][46][47][48]. These methods can be a very useful and accurate tools to optimize and predict weld properties (STS and CTS as well), but they are primarily applicable to a specific narrow application area, not to a wide range of material strength classes and combinations.…”
Section: Other Possibilities Of Strength Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Naturally, correlations get better and better, the narrower the sheet thickness and material range e.g., Rajarajan et al [33] predicted very accurately the STS, CTS, HV nugget values of RSWed DP800 steel sheets. Good estimations can be made with numerical [34][35][36][37][38] and finite element (FEM) simulations [39][40][41][42][43], machine learning [44], and artificial neural networks [45][46][47][48]. These methods can be a very useful and accurate tools to optimize and predict weld properties (STS and CTS as well), but they are primarily applicable to a specific narrow application area, not to a wide range of material strength classes and combinations.…”
Section: Other Possibilities Of Strength Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 1 Graphical representation of the literature data of the STS values is shown in similar[12-17, 25, 29, 31-35, 38, 39, 45, 49-239] and dissimilar[23,29,31,32,34,38,40,47,50,61,63,67,74,99,102,107,116,118,120,121,134,138,144,162,163,170,205,214,223,231,233, RSWed joints. For the dissimilar joints, the weaker side is depictured according to Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the base metal area, a coarse pearlite microstructure was visible, consisting of layers of black cementite and white ferrite, in the HAZ region there was a structural change to a fine pearlite microstructure, and in the weld nugget area, a fine pearlite microstructure was visible. As the welding current increases, the weld nugget area was dominated by the bainite microstructure, this occurs due to the different heat inputs for each variation of the welding parameters [9]. The bainite structure was formed through the heat treatment process of steel which was heated to reach the austenite temperature and cooled at high speed moderate [16].…”
Section: Shear Tensile Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It takes sufficient heat input to form a good nugget structure so as to produce maximum joint strength. The welding pressure time must be adjusted in order to get the results of the weld joint and good tensile strength [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%