2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2011.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure and properties of pipeline steel with a ferrite/martensite dual-phase microstructure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Austenite that did not transform to ferrite turned to martensite (M) with complicated substructures subdivided by LAB and HAB during quenching immediately after the hot-compression. The KAM value corresponds to local misorientation within each grain [25], so that it expresses the degree of strains accumulated within grains. Ferrite grains show smaller KAM values (less-red colours) than martensite representing more red colours in Figure 4(a), which corresponds to the difference in misorientation (lattice defects) between ferrite and martensite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Austenite that did not transform to ferrite turned to martensite (M) with complicated substructures subdivided by LAB and HAB during quenching immediately after the hot-compression. The KAM value corresponds to local misorientation within each grain [25], so that it expresses the degree of strains accumulated within grains. Ferrite grains show smaller KAM values (less-red colours) than martensite representing more red colours in Figure 4(a), which corresponds to the difference in misorientation (lattice defects) between ferrite and martensite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase transport efficiency and to lower the costs of pipeline construction, longitudinally submerged arc welded (LSAW) pipes with larger diameters and thicker walls have been increasingly used by the pipeline industry. [1][2][3][4] For example, in Russia, the LSAW pipeline in the Bovanenkovo-Ukhta project 2 was recently constructed with K65 steel (the highest grade of the Russian natural gas pipeline), which is similar in specifications and yield strength requirement (550 MPa grade) to API X80 but has a stricter low temperature toughness value of 60 J at −40°C (compared to −20°C for API X80 grade 5,6 ) due to the extreme Arctic environment. In that project, in which over 1.8 million tonnes of pipe were used, the target capacity is 50 billion m 3 /year, and the length of the main line is 2600 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, the toughness in the coarse grain heat affected zone (CGHAZ) of high grade pipeline steels deteriorates severely after the welding thermal cycle [4]. In order to evaluate and improve the toughness of the welding joint [5,6], it is necessary to show the evolution of microstructure and toughness in the CGHAZ with varying welding heat inputs, as well as the effective microstructure unit in control of toughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%