2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-008-3042-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure and phase stability in a Nb–Mo–Cr–Al–Si alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solidification of Sn-36 at.%Ni peritectic alloy was carried out with different growth rates (2,5,10,15,20,40 and 200 lm/s) at a constant temperature gradient (20 K/mm) in the Bridgman-type apparatus. With a predetermined growth distance of 30 mm reached, the samples were quickly quenched into liquid Ga-In-Sn alloy to preserve the microstructure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solidification of Sn-36 at.%Ni peritectic alloy was carried out with different growth rates (2,5,10,15,20,40 and 200 lm/s) at a constant temperature gradient (20 K/mm) in the Bridgman-type apparatus. With a predetermined growth distance of 30 mm reached, the samples were quickly quenched into liquid Ga-In-Sn alloy to preserve the microstructure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the dendrite microstructure is held in the mushy zone, coarsening sustained by the Gibbs-Thomson effect will occur [11][12][13][14][15][16][17], especially in alloys with larger freezing range. Because peritectic phase formed through peritectic reaction and transformation may change the solute transport between the secondary dendrite arms, coarsening will also be influenced by peritectic reaction during solidification of peritectic alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 There have been several studies of the patterning of Co/ Pt and similar materials using different techniques including: deposition onto patterned resist, 6 ion beam patterning using stencil masks, 7 focused ion beam patterning, 8 and the deposition onto prepatterned substrates. 9 The latter technique has produced the best results, with 30 nm diameter magnetic islands with a periodicity of 60 nm. It does, however, suffer from the drawback of sidewall deposition which could introduce coupling between the dots and the trench.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoimprint lithography ͑NIL͒ has emerged as a promising technique for patterning magnetic nanostructures which is capable of nanometer resolution and scalability. [6][7][8][9][10] In NIL, a resist is patterned by physical deformation with a mold assisted by either thermal effects or UV radiation. Magnetic nanostructures can then be fabricated by using the resist as a deposition template or as an etch mask.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%