2019
DOI: 10.3390/ma12020290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Pressure-Quenched SS304 Stainless Steel

Abstract: Bulk SS304 polycrystalline materials with ultrafine microstructures were prepared via a high-pressure self-heating melting and quenching method. Analyses of phase composition, grain size and microstructure were performed using metallographic analysis, X-ray diffraction, Rietveld refinement and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The effects of pressure and cooling rate on the solidification of SS304 were analyzed. Mechanical property test results show that, compared with the as-received sample, the hardnes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the test, the SEN sample had slightly higher average HV than AR, most likely due to carbide formation. These may impede dislocation movement after heat sensitization treatment at 649 o C. Generally, the hardness depends on the types of heat treatment process and crystal lattice dislocation at grain boundaries in relation to flow stress in the Hall-Petch relation [36]- [39]. The average HV measured after test were found to be higher than before test by 21% and 30% for AR1 and SEN1, respectively.…”
Section: Table 4: Summarized Results Under the Test Conditions Figure...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the test, the SEN sample had slightly higher average HV than AR, most likely due to carbide formation. These may impede dislocation movement after heat sensitization treatment at 649 o C. Generally, the hardness depends on the types of heat treatment process and crystal lattice dislocation at grain boundaries in relation to flow stress in the Hall-Petch relation [36]- [39]. The average HV measured after test were found to be higher than before test by 21% and 30% for AR1 and SEN1, respectively.…”
Section: Table 4: Summarized Results Under the Test Conditions Figure...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difraction peaks of the pressure quenched sample were wider than other samples, possible causes could be grain refnement and microstrain during the solidifcation process. Pressure quenched samples were found to possess better hardness and yield strength, although there was no improvement in ultimate tensile strength, and also, the rate of elongation got decreased due to the presence of large density dislocations [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Stainless steel (SS) can be divided into four categories: ferritic, martensitic, austenitic, and austenitic+ferritic (or duplex) SS. These steels can be distinguished according to their microstructural appearance at room temperature [3]. Although SS is known for its corrosion-resistant properties, other properties like fracture toughness and oxidative resistance can be altered by the addition of other alloying elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%