2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.04.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure and dispersive optical parameters of iron films deposited by the thermal evaporation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could explain the higher values of n and k for a-C:Fe* films and the tendency observed in Fig. 10b) [61,62].…”
Section: Ellipsometry Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could explain the higher values of n and k for a-C:Fe* films and the tendency observed in Fig. 10b) [61,62].…”
Section: Ellipsometry Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…10 it is seen that n varies from 2 to 2.75 for a-C:Fe* and a-C. Concerning iron, n and k for bulk or thin films are higher than for pure sputtered carbon [60,61], where n reaches values higher than 3 at 850 nm [61]. This could explain the higher values of n and k for a-C:Fe* films and the tendency observed in Fig.…”
Section: Ellipsometry Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…On the other hand, the influence on surface morphology and topography was smaller when varying the RF source power and target-to-substrate distances. The AFM and SEM results indicated a predominantly Volmer-Weber (3D island) growth mode, with the interaction between the adatoms being greater that their interaction with the substrate, growth mode generally observed for metals deposited at low temperatures [ 31 , 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%