2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure and creep behavior of DMS4-type nickel based superalloy single crystals with orientations near 〈001〉 and 〈011〉

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar as in the case of fatigue properties, the creep performance of superalloys is strongly dependent on the crystal orientation in which the material is loaded, see for example [76]. Literature studies often conclude that the 011 direction has worse creep properties than the 001 and 111 directions, see for example [55,[77][78][79]. One explanation for this is the orientation of the rafted γ -particles.…”
Section: Creepmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar as in the case of fatigue properties, the creep performance of superalloys is strongly dependent on the crystal orientation in which the material is loaded, see for example [76]. Literature studies often conclude that the 011 direction has worse creep properties than the 001 and 111 directions, see for example [55,[77][78][79]. One explanation for this is the orientation of the rafted γ -particles.…”
Section: Creepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decrease of the overall γ/γ interfacial energy is attributed to both an elastic interaction between the internal stresses at the γ/γ interface, [48], and the interaction of dislocations relaxing the lattice misfit [49,50]. Generally, the rafting phenomenon is connected to creep deformation at elevated temperatures, see for example [8,33,[51][52][53][54][55]. According to Matan et al [56] rafting may occur without any external loading, if a critical amount of plastic strain has been introduced in the material and that the temperature is high enough.…”
Section: Raftingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Literature often concludes that the h011i direction has worse creep properties compared to the h001i and h111i directions. [22][23][24][25] One explanation for this is the orientation of the rafted c¢-particles. [22] In h011i oriented specimens, the orientation of the rafting is 45 deg from the stress axis while for h001i specimens the rafting is either parallel or perpendicular to the stress axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25] One explanation for this is the orientation of the rafted c¢-particles. [22] In h011i oriented specimens, the orientation of the rafting is 45 deg from the stress axis while for h001i specimens the rafting is either parallel or perpendicular to the stress axis. The c¢-rafts oriented 45 deg from the stress axis do not act as good obstacles for dislocation motion as the parallel or perpendicular c¢-rafts, this is therefore one reason why the h011i direction show less creep strength than the h001i direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%