2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-7574-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure and compressive properties of carbon microballoons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uncoated CMBs were found to follow the trend of increasing average properties with tap density, as expected from prior research [5,6]. Thus, they were concluded to be a representative tap density of CMBs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The uncoated CMBs were found to follow the trend of increasing average properties with tap density, as expected from prior research [5,6]. Thus, they were concluded to be a representative tap density of CMBs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As before, this is likely due to the trend toward increasing average wall thickness with tap density. Figures 4 and 5 show the main intra-tap density trends observed earlier [5,6], with the UC 0.192 g/cm 3 tap density data plotted alongside. As expected, compressive strain at failure was again nearly proportional to the inverse square root of CMB diameter, regardless of tap density, see Figure 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Flawed single walled results were thought to be caused by irregularities or flaws in the surface and sphere wall. Nested results were thought to be caused by several internal compartments within the microsphere [25], [32], [33], [34]:…”
Section: : Microsphere Size Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%