1989
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(89)90265-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural study of creep rupture in a 12% chromium ferritic steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many measurements were performed by Wu and Sandström (1995) for a 12% Cr steel and led to the conclusion that the nucleation kinetics is controlled only by strain. They confirmed this result in Wu and Sandström (1996) where a review of more than ten other works concerning 0.5-2.25 and 12% Cr steels is added and supports their conclusions (see also Eggeler et al, 1989b). However, creep cavity measurements were only carried out on smooth creep specimens, for which the stress state is uniaxial and uniform.…”
Section: Model For the Damaged Materialssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many measurements were performed by Wu and Sandström (1995) for a 12% Cr steel and led to the conclusion that the nucleation kinetics is controlled only by strain. They confirmed this result in Wu and Sandström (1996) where a review of more than ten other works concerning 0.5-2.25 and 12% Cr steels is added and supports their conclusions (see also Eggeler et al, 1989b). However, creep cavity measurements were only carried out on smooth creep specimens, for which the stress state is uniaxial and uniform.…”
Section: Model For the Damaged Materialssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In Figure 6, experimental results are well reproduced using this well known LM parameter. However, long term creep data at 650 • C from Kimura et al (2000) and at 600 • C from Eggeler et al (1989b), who carried out creep tests longer than 30,000 h, show a change in the damage mechanism for longer failure times leading to premature failure in comparison with LM predictions, as shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Creep Fracture Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The damage mechanisms were analyzed using microstructural observations and quantitative measurements of the primary graphite dimensions. This approach is closely related to previous works [12,21,22], where mechanistically-based parameters were successfully used to quantify cavitation creep damage. After tensile and compression tests, samples were longitudinally cut and polished to measure the nodule parameters: surface fraction, mean size diameter and aspect ratio.…”
Section: Mechanical Testing and Damage Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Longterm creep specimens fracture after the coalescence of diffusional creep cavities. These ones nucleated and grew at austenitic grain and packet/block boundaries (Eggeler et al 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%