1996
DOI: 10.1179/mst.1996.12.11.963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural simulation of nickel base alloy Incone* 718 in production of turbine discs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
22
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The volume fraction dynamically recrystallised curves have been shifted along the time axis such that the volume fraction recrystallised just before the critical strain is reached are aligned. These graphs prove that strain rate affects recrystallisation kinetics in a way more complicated than by just altering the time over which dynamic recrystallisation can Figure 3, agree with Brand and coworkers [3] and Camus et al [4] who have explained the increased rate in meta-dynamic recrystallisation after deformation at high strain rates as a result of adiabatic heating. The observation that a shorter time before the onset of meta-dynamic recrystallisation resulted from an increase in strain rate and an increase in strain made by Sun and Hawbolt [2] has not been validated in this work as post deformation hold periods were not subjected to samples deformed to strains other than 0·82, however, this observation would fit in both with the experimental results shown here, and the theory already discussed as an increase in strain rate or strain would increase the dislocation density within the material, increasing the probability of nucleation events occurring.…”
Section: Influence Of Strain Ratesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The volume fraction dynamically recrystallised curves have been shifted along the time axis such that the volume fraction recrystallised just before the critical strain is reached are aligned. These graphs prove that strain rate affects recrystallisation kinetics in a way more complicated than by just altering the time over which dynamic recrystallisation can Figure 3, agree with Brand and coworkers [3] and Camus et al [4] who have explained the increased rate in meta-dynamic recrystallisation after deformation at high strain rates as a result of adiabatic heating. The observation that a shorter time before the onset of meta-dynamic recrystallisation resulted from an increase in strain rate and an increase in strain made by Sun and Hawbolt [2] has not been validated in this work as post deformation hold periods were not subjected to samples deformed to strains other than 0·82, however, this observation would fit in both with the experimental results shown here, and the theory already discussed as an increase in strain rate or strain would increase the dislocation density within the material, increasing the probability of nucleation events occurring.…”
Section: Influence Of Strain Ratesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…1 using both peak and steady-state stresses, are presented in Table 3. An activation energy of 430 kJ mol -1 for hot-working of solutiontreated IN718 (Type I microstructure) is in good agreement with values derived for the same material in the literature, 390-440 kJ mol -1 [8][9][10][11]. Higher values of Q for the Type II and Type III materials, as listed in Table 2, can be attributed to the presence of d precipitates; second-phase particles are known to affect the measured hot-working activation energy in steels [22] and two-phase titanium alloys [23].…”
Section: Deformation Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…2a, b. The overall behavior is in broad agreement with that usually observed for IN718: A distinct peak stress, tending to be more pronounced at higher strain rates, is followed by significant post-peak flow softening that is generally attributed to recrystallization and/or adiabatic heating [6][7][8][9][10]. Since all the flow curves presented here have been corrected for the effect of deformation heating, the observed flow softening must, in this case, be due to the evolving microstructural state of the material.…”
Section: Deformation Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]), they either fall into the category of being too simplistic and producing only an average grain size and approximate volume fraction recrystallised, or are far too complicated and too computationaly intensive to be used on a daily basis by process engineers. A model is required, therefore, that can be run within a commercially available finite element package, or in tandem with one, that will deliver detailed results, run in a reasonable time, and be simple to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%