2020
DOI: 10.1111/evj.13394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural properties of the proximal sesamoid bones of Thoroughbred racehorses in training

Abstract: Background: Proximal sesamoid bone fractures are common catastrophic injuries in racehorses. Understanding the response of proximal sesamoid bones to race training can inform fracture prevention strategies.Objectives: To describe proximal sesamoid bone microstructure of racehorses and to investigate the associations between microstructure and racing histories. Study design: Cross-sectional.Methods: Proximal sesamoid bones from 63 Thoroughbred racehorses were imaged using micro-computed tomography. Bone volume … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
15
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, the microstructure of the proximal sesamoid or dorsal MCIII bone has not been examined using our methodology. Our total specimen proximal sesamoid bone volume fraction results are comparable to a study isolating the midbody dorsal sesamoid bone (mean bone volume fraction 0.86 ± 0.06, similar to our 0.83 ± 0.05); however the bone mineral density in our specimens appears higher (mean 928.29 ± 12.60 compared to 828.56 ± 19.60 mg HA/ccm) ( 13 ). This may be due to differences in site selection, resolution of imaging, or local or individual microdamage as a number of microfractures are associated with BVTV in the proximal sesamoid ( 13 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To our knowledge, the microstructure of the proximal sesamoid or dorsal MCIII bone has not been examined using our methodology. Our total specimen proximal sesamoid bone volume fraction results are comparable to a study isolating the midbody dorsal sesamoid bone (mean bone volume fraction 0.86 ± 0.06, similar to our 0.83 ± 0.05); however the bone mineral density in our specimens appears higher (mean 928.29 ± 12.60 compared to 828.56 ± 19.60 mg HA/ccm) ( 13 ). This may be due to differences in site selection, resolution of imaging, or local or individual microdamage as a number of microfractures are associated with BVTV in the proximal sesamoid ( 13 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The differences in BVTV and BMD between studies may represent densification and remodeling due to different training volumes and microdamage burdens . Our samples were selected to have relatively low damage burdens and were therefore likely to have lower BVTV as damage and BVTV are highly correlated ( 9 , 13 ). Increasing bone mineral density with increased distance from the articular surface is a consistent feature in the palmar MCIII bone ( 16 , 20 , 32 ) and was also present in our dorsal MCIII and proximal sesamoid specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although palmar osteochondral disease was not analyzed in these cases, an abnormal articular surface of the third metacarpal condyle may play a role in microdamage accumulation in the articular margin of PSBs 25 . The location of microcracks at the articular subchondral margin is consistent with another study using micro‐CT as a modality for detection, where microcracks were most common in the articular mid‐body region in the calcified cartilage and subchondral bone detected at a resolution of 24.2 μm 27 . In the current study, microcracks were not detected via LUA‐stained micro‐CT with a resolution of 40 μm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…25 The location of microcracks at the articular subchondral margin is consistent with another study using micro-CT as a modality for detection, where microcracks were most common in the articular mid-body region in the calcified cartilage and subchondral bone detected at a resolution of 24.2 μm. 27 In the current study, microcracks were not detected via LUA-stained micro-CT with a resolution of 40 μm. LUA staining of the periphery could have obscured damage given that microcracks were only detected in the calcified cartilage and subchondral bone in the previous study by Ayodele et al It is also possible that microcracks were not detectable at a resolution of 40 μm.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%