2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural evaluation of interfacial intermetallic compounds in Cu wire bonding with Al and Au pads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of the intermetallic compound layer is a function of temperature and holding time. The atomic diffusion of Cu and Al through the intermetallic compound is the main controlling process for the intermetallic compound growth [12,21]. The analysis results in Figure 21 are analyzed and, in accordance with the literature, the CuAl 2 and Al 4 Cu 9 intermetallic phases are determined in the mixture region.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The thickness of the intermetallic compound layer is a function of temperature and holding time. The atomic diffusion of Cu and Al through the intermetallic compound is the main controlling process for the intermetallic compound growth [12,21]. The analysis results in Figure 21 are analyzed and, in accordance with the literature, the CuAl 2 and Al 4 Cu 9 intermetallic phases are determined in the mixture region.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In particular, to avoid a thermal effect from the curing of the EMCs during the molding process, phase characterization at an early aging time of 0 and 48 h was done with an unmolded Ag-Al bond. The TEM specimens were prepared with a standard in situ method using a dual beam-focused ion beam (FIB), and then, the specimens were finely ion-trimmed following the method of Kim et al [20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6shows the measured thicknesses values of the IMCs in μm with aging time in (a) h and (b) s 1/2 for the Ag-Al bonds in Green and Normal EMCs during HTSTs at 150 and 175°C. These figures suggest that the growth rate constant of the Ag-Al IMCs, D (cm 2 /s), follows the parabolic equation[20,23]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The mechanical properties of the welds, castings, sinters and coatings are strongly affected by the type, amount (thickness) and morphology of IMCs due to their hard and brittle nature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. It is well known that the thickness of IMCs should be controlled to less than 10 μm to obtain a sound dissimilar joint, e.g., Al/Mg [5], Al/Ti [6], Al/Cu [7], Mg/steel [8] and Al/steel [9]. Recently, Kim et al [2] found that by controlling the morphology of FeAl-type IMCs in cast steel, the ductility of the steel was significantly enhanced, which could alleviate the harmful effects of the hard and brittle nature of the IMCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%