2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.05.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural development and mechanical properties of drop tube atomized Al-2.85 wt% Fe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, some samples also show regions displaying the growth of primary dendritic α-Al. Based upon the metastable phase diagram proposed in our previous work [15], Al-3.9 wt% Fe misses the coupled zone for the Al-Al13Fe4 eutectic in favour of primary α-Al growth if a minimum of undercooling of 110 K is attained. In addition, much of the sample is occupied by eutectic, this being both the stable Al-Al13Fe4 lamellar eutectic and the metastable Al-Al6Fe rod-like eutectic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, some samples also show regions displaying the growth of primary dendritic α-Al. Based upon the metastable phase diagram proposed in our previous work [15], Al-3.9 wt% Fe misses the coupled zone for the Al-Al13Fe4 eutectic in favour of primary α-Al growth if a minimum of undercooling of 110 K is attained. In addition, much of the sample is occupied by eutectic, this being both the stable Al-Al13Fe4 lamellar eutectic and the metastable Al-Al6Fe rod-like eutectic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Figure 4d shows that both rod-like and lamellar eutectic with different sizes and densities are present in the sample, and that these eutectics are divided by a distinct boundary. Our previous research [15] has shown that while the lamellar eutectic is Al-Al13Fe4, metastable Al-Al6Fe eutectic adopts a rod-like structure. That is, both stable Al-Al13Fe4 and metastable Al-Al6Fe eutectics are formed in the slowest cooled sample.…”
Section: Xrd Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As such, for gas atomization, cooling rates obtained using a heat balance equation (such as shown in Equation 1) would not necessarily be expected to show strong agreement with cooling rates calculated by measurements of secondary dendrite arm spacing (SDAS). In contrast, drop tube studies have shown strong agreement between cooling rates inferred from SDAS measurements and those obtained via Equation 1one such agreement was recently shown in drop tube processed Al-2.85 wt% Fe [26].…”
Section: Drop Tube Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 75%