2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural damage based modeling of thermal conductivity of cyclically loaded CFRP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The length of these short ellipsoidal fibers was considered equal to the average length between two fiber cracks to account for fiber damage. Average length between two fiber cracks, l, was then given by 3 where LV (=(VV)f/πrf2) is the length of fibers per unit volume of the composite, true(VVtrue)f is the fiber volume fraction, rf is the average fiber radius, and true(NVtrue)f is the number of fiber cracks per unit volume (fiber crack density) of the composite. To consider interface debonding, a fraction of ellipsoidal fibers, with total interface area equal to the debonded area, was considered as completely debonded.…”
Section: Mean Field Micromechanics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of these short ellipsoidal fibers was considered equal to the average length between two fiber cracks to account for fiber damage. Average length between two fiber cracks, l, was then given by 3 where LV (=(VV)f/πrf2) is the length of fibers per unit volume of the composite, true(VVtrue)f is the fiber volume fraction, rf is the average fiber radius, and true(NVtrue)f is the number of fiber cracks per unit volume (fiber crack density) of the composite. To consider interface debonding, a fraction of ellipsoidal fibers, with total interface area equal to the debonded area, was considered as completely debonded.…”
Section: Mean Field Micromechanics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, many damage models were developed to simulate growth of damage in composite materials. Two main important approaches were followed in the literature to investigate the damage behavior of a composite lamina, experimental damage-inspection (Chowdhury et al., 2018; Hiremath et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2018) using electronic-microscopy and damage-modeling (Abu-Farsakh and Asfa, 2018; Abu-Farsakh et al., 1999; Christian et al., 2018; Kattan and Voyiadjis, 1993; Schapery, 1990; Okabe et al., 2018; Pineda and Waas, 2013; Zhao et al., 2018) using macro- and micro-mechanical approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using pulse thermography, thermal conductivity can be used to trace microstructural damage localization and growth. Hiremath et al. (2018) proposed a new model which assumed that material thermal resistance changes with the evolution of damage due to interface debonding and fiber-breakage during fatigue loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few techniques have been proposed in literature, such as thermography, acoustic emission, and fibre optics [5,6,7]. The thermography method is used to examine subsurface damage, the technique uses energy radiated from the composite surface and infrared camera to monitor heat flux at composite material surfaces [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes CFRP an inherently smart material, as changes in the electrical conductivity will occur as deformation or damage occur within the structure [29][30] [31]. It also means that electrical conductivity measurements in CFRP laminates have the potential to out-perform other methods, such as fibre optics, thermography, and acoustic methods, as it employs carbon fibres themselves as the sensing element, removing the need for additional sensors to be added [32,33,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%