1992
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(92)95064-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural characterization of iron ion implantation of silicon carbide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further the 57 Fe concentration profile (figure 3) results in a distribution of local neighbourhoods of Fe atoms (also in the core of the particles), which in addition to the effect of the particle size distribution contributes to the distribution P(QS). The P(QS) results at RT for our as-implanted samples are almost the same as in the work of McHargue and Horton [51,52], although the samples in [48] and [49] were implanted at RT (our samples were held at an elevated temperature of 350 • C during implantation) and no annealing procedure was applied afterwards. One can notice in table 2 that the average isomer shift δ of all samples at RT is positive and relatively small (about 0.12-0.13 mm s −1 ).…”
Section: Mössbauer Spectroscopy (Cems)mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Further the 57 Fe concentration profile (figure 3) results in a distribution of local neighbourhoods of Fe atoms (also in the core of the particles), which in addition to the effect of the particle size distribution contributes to the distribution P(QS). The P(QS) results at RT for our as-implanted samples are almost the same as in the work of McHargue and Horton [51,52], although the samples in [48] and [49] were implanted at RT (our samples were held at an elevated temperature of 350 • C during implantation) and no annealing procedure was applied afterwards. One can notice in table 2 that the average isomer shift δ of all samples at RT is positive and relatively small (about 0.12-0.13 mm s −1 ).…”
Section: Mössbauer Spectroscopy (Cems)mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…On the contrary, nuclear shocks create many defects and cause the loss of the nanolamellar structure of Ti 3 SiC 2 , albeit without leading to amorphization like in the case of SiC for doses reaching some tenths of dpa [51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. It was shown that defect creation reduces dislocation mobility, and increases hardness [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…24,[26][27][28][29][30] The range of reported recrystallization temperatures appears to be related to the variety of characterization equipment used. Typically, analysis of the postimplantation microstructure has been done via X-ray diffraction, 21,31 Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy in channeling mode (RBS-C), 24,27,[31][32][33][34] transmission electron microscopy (TEM), 19,21,35,36 or step height measurements utilizing surface metrology techniques. 20,24,26 In this analysis, TEM was used to evaluate focused ion beam (FIB) cross sections of the surface of Cs -implanted 3C-SiC as a function of annealing temperatures and times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of reported recrystallization temperatures appears to be related to the variety of characterization equipment used. Typically, analysis of the postimplantation microstructure has been done via X‐ray diffraction, Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy in channeling mode (RBS‐C), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), or step height measurements utilizing surface metrology techniques …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%