2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural characterization and evaluation of pervaporation performance of thin-film composite membranes fabricated through interfacial polymerization on hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with TFC‐control membrane, all SIP‐modified TFC membranes exhibit smoother surfaces, probably because of the newly formed ultrathin and non‐uniform PA layer by SIP reaction between CDs and TMC, which flattens the rough structure on the previously formed PA layer (Figure S7). In addition, TFC‐ β ‐CD membrane has the smoothest surface among all SIP‐modified TFC membranes, since β ‐CD with the smaller molecular size than all amine‐CDs has the fastest immigration rate, promoting the polymer chain mobility and the chain packing efficiently during SIP reaction 23 . Moreover, after IP, the porous support layer is covered by the additional thin dense layer, confirming the successful formation of the selective layer All SIP‐modified TFC membranes exhibit the thicker selective layers than that of TFC‐control membrane because of the formed additional polyester or polyamide networks by SIP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with TFC‐control membrane, all SIP‐modified TFC membranes exhibit smoother surfaces, probably because of the newly formed ultrathin and non‐uniform PA layer by SIP reaction between CDs and TMC, which flattens the rough structure on the previously formed PA layer (Figure S7). In addition, TFC‐ β ‐CD membrane has the smoothest surface among all SIP‐modified TFC membranes, since β ‐CD with the smaller molecular size than all amine‐CDs has the fastest immigration rate, promoting the polymer chain mobility and the chain packing efficiently during SIP reaction 23 . Moreover, after IP, the porous support layer is covered by the additional thin dense layer, confirming the successful formation of the selective layer All SIP‐modified TFC membranes exhibit the thicker selective layers than that of TFC‐control membrane because of the formed additional polyester or polyamide networks by SIP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various explorations have been made to address these issues of TFC membranes, such as employing suitable amine and acyl chloride monomers, 5,10,23,24 incorporating hydrophilic additives or co‐solvent in the aqueous or organic phase, 25‐28 as well as optimizing the substrate morphology or surface properties before the IP process 29‐31 . Compared to above methods, second interfacial polymerization (SIP) is considered to be the ideal strategy to obtain the dense and hydrophilic selective layer, because it can easily regulate crosslinking degree and hydrophilicity of selective layer simultaneously using multifunctional group materials with strong hydrophilicity 32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porous PAN-nonwoven substrate (200 mm) was treated with a 1.0 M NaOH (aq) (60 1C, 0.5 h) for oxidation of the PAN layer surface, 36 washed with water, and dried at 50 1C under a vacuum overnight. To ensure the surface hydrophilicity of the alkali-treated PAN layer of the substrate, the substrate was stored in water prior to use.…”
Section: Preparation Of Lignin-based Tfc Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TFC membranes manufactured through the method of interfacial polymerization have been widely used in the fields of reverse osmosis [3,4] and nanofiltration [5][6][7] separation processes, but are rarely applied to pervaporation. Interfacial polymerization produces a variety of polymer layers, including those of polyamide [8][9][10][11][12], polyester [8,9,[13][14][15][16][17], and polyurea [18]. In 1977, Rozelle et al [19] used polyethyleneimine (PEI) and toluene diisocyanate (TDI) for interfacial polymerization to prepare NS-100 composite polyurea membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%