2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/695/1/012002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural and magnetic analysis of a superconducting foam and comparison with IG-processed bulk samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The microstructure investigations were performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). More details about these measurements can be found in previous publications [27,28].…”
Section: Such a 211 Foam Is Presented Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microstructure investigations were performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). More details about these measurements can be found in previous publications [27,28].…”
Section: Such a 211 Foam Is Presented Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here it is important to point out that the foam samples share this behavior with the melt-textured, IG processed YBCO bulks as discussed in Ref. [10]. This demonstrates that the specific microstructure with embedded, tiny 211 particles which both materials have in common, is responsible for this peak position and the resulting shape of the pinning function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…the variation of the microstructure and of the linked superconducting properties throughout the foam structure, which was not addressed in previous works [8]- [10]. This information is a valuable input for modelling of the foam structure, which can make use of attempts already existing in the literature on open-cell polyurethane and metal foams [11], [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microstructure of both types of samples is, however, similar to each other, and both samples share the presence of many, very small 211 particles as discussed in Ref. [18]. These particles provide additional flux pinning, and the pinning force scaling of these two sample types exhibit peak positions of ∼0.5 and a completely different shape of the resulting pinning function which resembles a dome-shape.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…1 × 1 × 0.5 mm 3 ). For the RE-123 materials, we have chosen a bulk YBCO sample [15] prepared via the infiltration-growth (IG) process [16], [17], a strut of a YBCO foam due to its outstanding pinning properties [5], [18], [19], and a (Nd,Eu,Gd)-123 (NEG) melt-textured bulk with TiO 2 -nanoparticles enhancing the flux pinning properties [20], [21]. For MgB 2 , we selected a sample prepared via solid-state sintering [6], a spark-plasma sintered sample [7], [22] and a sintered sample with added carbon-encapsulated boron [23], [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%