2002
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392002000300022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural and Fractographic Characterization of a Thermally Embrittled Nuclear Grade Steel: Part I - Annealing

Abstract: A nuclear reactor pressure vessel steel was submitted to different annealing heat treatments aimed at simulating neutron irradiation damage. The obtained microstructures were mechanically tested with subsequent metallographic and fractographic characterization. The relevant microstructural and fractographic aspects were employed in the interpretation of the mechanical behavior of the microstructures in both quasi-static (J-R curve) and dynamic (Charpy impact) loading regimes. A well defined relationship was de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that this sensitivity was expressed in a reverse fashion than that normally observed for microalloyed steels, such as for microstructures J and L, when higher loading rates inhibits ductility. Figure 4f displays the fracture surface of the annealed microstructure H, which exhibits a predominantly ductile aspect, which greatly differs from the honeycomb morphology presented earlier 1 , with shallow microvoids denoting a lower fracture toughness 1 . This indicates that the more severely annealed microstructures assessed in Part I, as well as the Q&T, I, K and M, tend to show a reverse sensitivity to strain rate as above commented, i.e., increasing ductility by raising the loading rate.…”
Section: Fractographymentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that this sensitivity was expressed in a reverse fashion than that normally observed for microalloyed steels, such as for microstructures J and L, when higher loading rates inhibits ductility. Figure 4f displays the fracture surface of the annealed microstructure H, which exhibits a predominantly ductile aspect, which greatly differs from the honeycomb morphology presented earlier 1 , with shallow microvoids denoting a lower fracture toughness 1 . This indicates that the more severely annealed microstructures assessed in Part I, as well as the Q&T, I, K and M, tend to show a reverse sensitivity to strain rate as above commented, i.e., increasing ductility by raising the loading rate.…”
Section: Fractographymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The microstructures J and L, Figs. 3b and 3d, are characterized by a wide distribution of microvoids, resembling microstructure A 1 . The microstructure L exhibits a more planar fracture aspect, or less energetic than J.…”
Section: Fractographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When these cleavage facets are observed in a high-magnification micrograph (Figure 5(d)), they are composed of somewhat flat and smooth surfaces containing many weak river patterns, which give a sign of the decreased fracture resistance. [36] IV. DISCUSSION…”
Section: B In Situ Sem Fracture Testmentioning
confidence: 99%