2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.11.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural analysis of glass-steel interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation in thickness of interface indicates that the interfacial reaction influences the diffusion process. This causes sinusoidal nature of interface as has been reported earlier 10. However, few numbers of pits can be seen in the steel away from the interface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variation in thickness of interface indicates that the interfacial reaction influences the diffusion process. This causes sinusoidal nature of interface as has been reported earlier 10. However, few numbers of pits can be seen in the steel away from the interface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This causes sinusoidal nature of interface as has been reported earlier. 10 However, few numbers of pits can be seen in the steel away from the interface. This is due to the presence of some defects in steel.…”
Section: Results and Discussion X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%