1991
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(91)91002-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstrip proportional counters for X-ray astronomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, substrate effects have led to considerable difficulties with operational stability, particularly at high flux levels . Various studies to determine the optimum configuration for an MSGC have been performed (Bouclier, Garabatos, Manzin, Sauli, Shekhtman & Temmel, 1993;Beckers, Bouclier, Garabatos, Million, Sauli & Shekhtman, 1994 1993; Allunni, Bouclier, Fara, Garabatos, Manzin, Million, Ropelewski, Sauli, Shekhtman, Daubie, Pingot, Pestov, Busso & Costa, 1993;Budtz-Jorgensen, Bahnsen, Olesen, Madsen, Jonasson, Schnopper & Oed, 1991), but at the time of writing the optimum characteristics for an MSGC are still unclear with somewhat conflicting results being reported by different groups. It seems clear that the substrate must possess sufficient conductivity to prevent charge up and polarization, or gain instabilities will result; however, highconductivity substrates can allow high current flow which causes heating.…”
Section: Detector Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, substrate effects have led to considerable difficulties with operational stability, particularly at high flux levels . Various studies to determine the optimum configuration for an MSGC have been performed (Bouclier, Garabatos, Manzin, Sauli, Shekhtman & Temmel, 1993;Beckers, Bouclier, Garabatos, Million, Sauli & Shekhtman, 1994 1993; Allunni, Bouclier, Fara, Garabatos, Manzin, Million, Ropelewski, Sauli, Shekhtman, Daubie, Pingot, Pestov, Busso & Costa, 1993;Budtz-Jorgensen, Bahnsen, Olesen, Madsen, Jonasson, Schnopper & Oed, 1991), but at the time of writing the optimum characteristics for an MSGC are still unclear with somewhat conflicting results being reported by different groups. It seems clear that the substrate must possess sufficient conductivity to prevent charge up and polarization, or gain instabilities will result; however, highconductivity substrates can allow high current flow which causes heating.…”
Section: Detector Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore ι μ ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι Pulse height distribution of very low energy X-rays obtained with a microstrip gas detector [118] one can expect a much better energy resolution than obtained with wire proportional counters. Therefore ι μ ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι ι Pulse height distribution of very low energy X-rays obtained with a microstrip gas detector [118] one can expect a much better energy resolution than obtained with wire proportional counters.…”
Section: Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glass substrates have been widely used for making MSGCs [1,[3][4][5][6][8][9][10][11][12][13].Glass has a very smooth surface and is suitable for photolithography processing. Recent work has shown that electronic conduction in the glass is responsible for achieving stable operation and high rate capability for a MSGC [9][10][11].…”
Section: Msgc On Glass Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…INTRODUCTION The introduction of the Microstrip Gas Chamber (MSGC) by A. Oed [1] has attracted a great deal of attention over the last five years. Many efforts [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] have demonstrated that this new gas detector has much improved performance over a conventional Multi-Wire Proportional Chamber (MWPC). Its energy resolution, spatial resolution, rate capability radiation resistance, and low cost .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation