2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000128281.67589.b4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microspheres Accurately Predict Regional Bone Blood Flow

Abstract: Even though the microsphere method frequently is used to determinate bone blood flow, validation of this technique for bone blood flow measurement is incomplete. The method is based on the principle that injected microspheres are distributed with the arterial blood and trapped in the capillaries because of their diameter (15 µm). The number of spheres lodged in an organ is proportional to its blood flow. The number of radioactive or fluorescent microspheres in a specific organ is determined indirectly by measu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different methods measure different levels of the circulatory system, such as limb blood flow and local microcirculation. Blood flow in bone tissue has been evaluated using bone scintigraphy [8], single-photon emission computed tomography [11], Doppler ultrasonography [21], radionuclide-labeled and fluorescent microspheres [1], positron emission tomography [15], laser-Doppler flowmetry [14,25], and intravital microscopy television system in combination with confocal laser-scanning optics [20]. The last two techniques require surgical manipulation of the bone and therefore may introduce artifacts attributable to local manipulation of the vessels.…”
Section: Clinical and Anatomical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods measure different levels of the circulatory system, such as limb blood flow and local microcirculation. Blood flow in bone tissue has been evaluated using bone scintigraphy [8], single-photon emission computed tomography [11], Doppler ultrasonography [21], radionuclide-labeled and fluorescent microspheres [1], positron emission tomography [15], laser-Doppler flowmetry [14,25], and intravital microscopy television system in combination with confocal laser-scanning optics [20]. The last two techniques require surgical manipulation of the bone and therefore may introduce artifacts attributable to local manipulation of the vessels.…”
Section: Clinical and Anatomical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femur, tibia, paw, and tail vertebrae (caudal 1-4) were immediately harvested and cleaned of soft tissue. Microspheres were recovered after published digestion/filtration methods (18,(41)(42)(43). In brief, individual bones were weighed, demineralized in Cal-Ex (Fisher Scientific), and digested in ethanolic KOH.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine whether a cold-induced reduction in skeletal blood supply contributed to extremity foreshortening, we measured relative bone blood flow (BBF) to the hindlimb bones and tail base of juvenile mice by using fluorescent microspheres, a reliable standard for quantifying regional organ and bone perfusion (18). We predicted that BBF would positively covary with rearing temperature and bone elongation as previously hypothesized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular consideration are the many parameters that need to be accurately accounted for: sufficient mixing in the central circulation, good first pass extraction, no separation from the blood, no measurement possible in the second of two capillary beds in series, no obstruction of arterioles, tracer leakage from particle, homogenous particle size, and label intensity. 48 Despite these limitations, it has been used under many different experimental circumstances to measure regional bone blood flow 2,33,37,39,40,43,45, and has been used to validate new blood flow methods in bone such as noble gas washout 34 and laser Doppler flowmetry. 70 The hydrogen washout method of regional blood flow measurement was developed by the Norwegian physiologist Aukland and colleagues 38 and first applied to bone tissue by Whiteside et al 6 in the rabbit; he assumed that his measurements were accurate because they were similar to those reported by other methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,32 Radioactive labeled microsphere entrapment is widely regarded as the gold standard of indirect methods of blood flow measurement and has been used to validate other techniques. [33][34][35] The use of high-energy gamma-emitting radioactive labels and the necessity to remove tissues for measurement means that it is unsuited for the clinical setting. Furthermore, tissues of sufficient size and/or blood flow to allow sufficient entrapment in the capillary bed are needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%