2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04501-6_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microslip Joint Damping Prediction Using Thin-Layer Elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main disadvantage of all presented methods are, that they are limited to the defined interaction law or properties of the components. Advanced methods to consider dynamic joint properties focus on the approach of a material gradient in the interaction zone [9][10][11]. Thereby, the so-called Thin-Layer-Element (TLE) method is used.…”
Section: Simulative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main disadvantage of all presented methods are, that they are limited to the defined interaction law or properties of the components. Advanced methods to consider dynamic joint properties focus on the approach of a material gradient in the interaction zone [9][10][11]. Thereby, the so-called Thin-Layer-Element (TLE) method is used.…”
Section: Simulative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, two methods are established to calibrate the numerical joint properties: a purely numerical parameter optimization study [14] and a calibration of the simulation with experimental determined joint properties [9,15].…”
Section: Simulative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the flange clamping area, the sub-flange stiffness 34,35 is wherein E i is the sub-flange elastic modulus, D i is the diameter of nut pressure area, d i is the bolt hole diameter, t i is the sub-flange thickness, is the half pressure-cone angle. For two flanges with same thickness, as shown in Figure 11, the stiffness of sub-flange 1 k m1 and the stiffness of sub-flange 2 k m2 , are determined by applying substitution (25) and (26), respectively:…”
Section: Stiffness Of Aero-engine Bolted Jointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahmadian et al 24 introduced the same method into the contact interfaces of AWE-MACE structure and used a layer of special interface elements having material properties to improve the prediction of the complete model, the parameters of the thin-layer elements were modified by using the optimization algorithm based on the modal test results. Bograd et al 25,26 considered the bolted joint damping and performed the experiments to find the damping and stiffness parameters of the bolted joints, then the joint's interfaces were modeled with the thin-layer elements which contained the acquired experimental parameters. Ma 27 applied the thin-layer elements into the welding parts of the aeroengine casing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%