Proceedings of SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference 2002
DOI: 10.2523/78203-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microseismic Response of Well Casing Failures at a Thermal Heavy Oil Operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Casing failure events have a unique seismic signature that differentiates them from shear events (Talebi et al, 1998). The casing failure model has proven to be robust with a detection success rate of greater than 80% (Smith et al, 2002). A combination of the waveform characteristics, the analysis of arrival times, hodogram analysis and integration of engineering data (pressure, steam injection rate) facilitates the classification and localization of the events.…”
Section: Microseismic For Operations Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Casing failure events have a unique seismic signature that differentiates them from shear events (Talebi et al, 1998). The casing failure model has proven to be robust with a detection success rate of greater than 80% (Smith et al, 2002). A combination of the waveform characteristics, the analysis of arrival times, hodogram analysis and integration of engineering data (pressure, steam injection rate) facilitates the classification and localization of the events.…”
Section: Microseismic For Operations Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the dilation tendency of the oilsands is significant (Agar, 1984;Kosar, 1989;Wong et al, 1993;Samieh, 1995). This is especially true under low confining pressures.…”
Section: A General Description On the Reservoir Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normally if InSAR is used in Alberta, a large number of corner reflectors are installed to increase the signal coherence. Microseismic monitoring is used in CSS to primarily monitor the casing deformation and failure (Smith et al, 2002), but it should be noted that the microseismic is not suitable to provide the early warnings against potential caprock deformation and failure events. Unlike CSS, the impact of SAGD on caprock is temperature-driven meaning that the temperature process is transient.…”
Section: Major Geomechanical Work For the Caprock Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation