2023
DOI: 10.3390/en16104177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microseismic Monitoring at the Farnsworth CO2-EOR Field

Abstract: The Farnsworth Unit in northern Texas is a field site for studying geologic carbon storage during enhanced oil recovery (EOR) using CO2. Microseismic monitoring is essential for risk assessment by detecting fluid leakage and fractures. We analyzed borehole microseismic data acquired during CO2 injection and migration, including data denoising, event detection, event location, magnitude estimation, moment tensor inversion, and stress field inversion. We detected and located two shallow clusters, which occurred … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the success of incorporating anisotropy into the modeling implies that the fracture networks are relatively extensive, at least in certain formations. Indeed, HTI behavior may account for some of the microseismicity that has been seen in the formations overlying Morrow B [22]. Likewise, the success of the noise attenuation algorithms may suggest that the industrial operations associated with the active oilfield have the potential to substantially interfere with the seismic processing and interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the success of incorporating anisotropy into the modeling implies that the fracture networks are relatively extensive, at least in certain formations. Indeed, HTI behavior may account for some of the microseismicity that has been seen in the formations overlying Morrow B [22]. Likewise, the success of the noise attenuation algorithms may suggest that the industrial operations associated with the active oilfield have the potential to substantially interfere with the seismic processing and interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%