2011
DOI: 10.7567/jjap.50.015701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopy and Electrical Properties of Ge/Ge Interfaces Bonded by Surface-Activated Wafer Bonding Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the interlayer at the interface fabricated by surface activated bonding is an amorphous layer produced by Ar beam irradiation, and the interlayer in the interface fabricated by plasma activation bonding is a GeO 2 layer, whose resistance is an order of magnitude greater. This result is consistent with reports [38] that the resistance of bonding interfaces fabricated by surface activated bonding is very small, close to the bulk value.…”
Section: Ge Far-infrared Detectorsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the interlayer at the interface fabricated by surface activated bonding is an amorphous layer produced by Ar beam irradiation, and the interlayer in the interface fabricated by plasma activation bonding is a GeO 2 layer, whose resistance is an order of magnitude greater. This result is consistent with reports [38] that the resistance of bonding interfaces fabricated by surface activated bonding is very small, close to the bulk value.…”
Section: Ge Far-infrared Detectorsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…15) Recently, the SAB of Ge wafers has also been reported for infrared detectors. [16][17][18][19][20][21] However, little work has focused on the effects of the bonding conditions on the mechanical and electrical properties and microstructure of the Ge/Ge bonded interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16) Similar I-V characteristics of Ge=Ge prepared by SAB have been reported. 18) The existence of the thin GeO 2 layer increases the junction resistance. Therefore, bonding methods must be chosen carefully if low-resistance interfaces are to be expected.…”
Section: Ge Wafer Bonding For Photodetectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%