2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.134236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic void distribution of 3D printed polymer composites with different printing direction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shuto et al [21] studied the influence of nozzle temperature on the porosity and filament deformation and concluded that nozzle temperature had little influence on porosity, while filament area fraction was higher at both ends of the printable temperature range. Liao et al [22] used high-resolution X-ray microscopy to quantitatively count the number of voids in different printing directions and obtained results that the void volume of the sample with the 0 • printing direction was much higher than that with the printing path of 45/−45 or 0/90.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shuto et al [21] studied the influence of nozzle temperature on the porosity and filament deformation and concluded that nozzle temperature had little influence on porosity, while filament area fraction was higher at both ends of the printable temperature range. Liao et al [22] used high-resolution X-ray microscopy to quantitatively count the number of voids in different printing directions and obtained results that the void volume of the sample with the 0 • printing direction was much higher than that with the printing path of 45/−45 or 0/90.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%