2019
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.2875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic visualization of virus removal by dedicated filters used in biopharmaceutical processing: Impact of membrane structure and localization of captured virus particles

Abstract: Virus filtration with nanometer size exclusion membranes (“nanofiltration”) is effective for removing infectious agents from biopharmaceuticals. While the virus removal capability of virus removal filters is typically evaluated based on calculation of logarithmic reduction value (LRV) of virus infectivity, knowledge of the exact mechanism(s) of virus retention remains limited. Here, human parvovirus B19 (B19V), a small virus (18–26 nm), was spiked into therapeutic plasma protein solutions and filtered through … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 30 The capacity of Planova 20N to robustly remove B19V has also been demonstrated by microscopic observations of the nanofilter. 47 Finally, another small blood‐borne non‐enveloped virus, hepatitis E virus (HEV), with a size of 27–34 nm, was also demonstrated to be removed by Planova 20N. 48 Therefore, all known blood‐borne viruses of clinical relevance are removed by Planova 20N, providing a large safety margin to NHPPL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 30 The capacity of Planova 20N to robustly remove B19V has also been demonstrated by microscopic observations of the nanofilter. 47 Finally, another small blood‐borne non‐enveloped virus, hepatitis E virus (HEV), with a size of 27–34 nm, was also demonstrated to be removed by Planova 20N. 48 Therefore, all known blood‐borne viruses of clinical relevance are removed by Planova 20N, providing a large safety margin to NHPPL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different membrane structures of the Planova 20N and 15N hollow fibers have different numbers of retaining pore structures, 22 which presumably generates differences in virus retention capacity. The difference in the MVM capture distribution confirms that there are differences between the filters in the membrane pore structures that contribute to virus retention (Figures 4d , S4 B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the above, we can conclude that the parvovirus model cannot be used every time. A few works provided an image for the parvovirus retention mechanism in the filter using immune detection and SEM for PPV and B19V (Adan-Kubo et al 2019 ) (Hongo-Hirasaki et al 2011 ). Moreover, TEM technique is also used for detecting the viral particles in the filter membrane.…”
Section: Air Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%