2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11440-021-01403-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic origin of shape-dependent shear strength of granular materials: a granular dynamics perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It affects the local void radius, throat radius, and void shape factor of the packing system. Irregularly shaped crushed rocks have a greater ability to prevent sliding and rotation within a specific area [48], thus enhancing the interlocking effect among them. This interlocking effect [49] facilitates the formation of larger cavities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It affects the local void radius, throat radius, and void shape factor of the packing system. Irregularly shaped crushed rocks have a greater ability to prevent sliding and rotation within a specific area [48], thus enhancing the interlocking effect among them. This interlocking effect [49] facilitates the formation of larger cavities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the similarities between granular flows and Bingham fluids, a simple linear function is firstly adopted for bridging the effective friction coefficient μeff${\mu _{{\rm{eff}}}}$ and the inertial number I$I$ 33 : μeffbadbreak=μmingoodbreak+bI\begin{equation}{\mu _{{\rm{eff}}}} = {\mu _{\min }} + bI\end{equation}where b$b$ is a constant, and μmin${\mu _{{\rm{min}}}}$ is the minimum value of effective friction coefficient . Hatano 56 found the nonlinear relation between μeff${\mu _{{\rm{eff}}}}$ and I$I$ roughly obeys a power law 100,102 as: μeffbadbreak=μmingoodbreak+sIα\begin{equation}{\mu _{{\rm{eff}}}} = {\mu _{\min }} + s{I^\alpha }\end{equation}where s$s$ and α$\alpha $ are constants. Equations (11) and (12) imply that μeff${\mu _{{\rm{eff}}}}$ could reach arbitrary values as I$I$ increases, which is incompatible with experimental results 6,96 for large inertial number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where 𝑏 is a constant, and 𝜇 min is the minimum value of effective friction coefficient . Hatano 56 found the nonlinear relation between 𝜇 ef f and 𝐼 roughly obeys a power law 100,102 as:…”
Section: Inertial Number and Friction Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the fragmentation and damage of particles are not considered for simplicity; rather, the macroscopic failure and damage are derived from the rearrangement of particles. To characterize the intensity of the rearrangement of RVEs and represent the developing macroscopic material plasticity, a mesoscale parameter, the granular temperature 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴 (Zou et al, 2022), is introduced:…”
Section: Mesoscale Coupling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the fragmentation and damage of particles are not considered for simplicity; rather, the macroscopic failure and damage are derived from the rearrangement of particles. To characterize the intensity of the rearrangement of RVEs and represent the developing macroscopic material plasticity, a mesoscale parameter, the granular temperature T $T$ (Zou et al., 2022), is introduced: T=1Dδbold-italicv·δbold-italicv $T=\frac{1}{D}\langle \delta \boldsymbol{v}\cdot \delta \boldsymbol{v}\rangle $ where δv $\delta v$ is the fluctuating velocity and D $D$ is the dimension of the simulation (D=2 $D=2$ in this study). The fluctuating velocity is defined as the velocity difference between particle i $i$ and the corresponding neighboring particle, that is, δbold-italicv=vivnormalnnormalenormalinormalgnormalh $\delta \boldsymbol{v}={\boldsymbol{v}}_{i}-{\boldsymbol{v}}_{\mathrm{n}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{h}}$.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%