1991
DOI: 10.1016/0265-3036(91)90020-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic examination of keratin substrates subjected to the action of the enzymes of Streptomyces fradiae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Keratin is quite resistant to attack by normal proteolytic enzymes and chemical and physical means due to its super‐coiled helical structure, high degree of cross‐linking by disulfide bonds, hydrogen bonds, and hydrophobic interactions, and its insolubility in water (Noval and Nickerson, 1959; Mathison, 1964). If this is indeed the case, the use of keratinophilic species such as Streptomyces fradiae (Noval and Nickerson, 1959; Katuzewska et al, 1991) and Thermoactinomyces candidus (Ignatova et al, 1999) may aid the decomposition of the sludge, providing that conditions for their growth and proliferation are suitable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keratin is quite resistant to attack by normal proteolytic enzymes and chemical and physical means due to its super‐coiled helical structure, high degree of cross‐linking by disulfide bonds, hydrogen bonds, and hydrophobic interactions, and its insolubility in water (Noval and Nickerson, 1959; Mathison, 1964). If this is indeed the case, the use of keratinophilic species such as Streptomyces fradiae (Noval and Nickerson, 1959; Katuzewska et al, 1991) and Thermoactinomyces candidus (Ignatova et al, 1999) may aid the decomposition of the sludge, providing that conditions for their growth and proliferation are suitable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An appropriate filler should be a good alternative for fibrin, should not degrade prematurely and concede its scaffolding function, and should not linger and impede axonal sprouting. Most natural scaffold-based fillers are limited by the early dissolution or prolonged presence of the matrix. , One exception has been identified in keratin hydrogels, which are touted as promising neuro-inductive filler materials. , Specifically, KOS fulfils the above-mentioned structural criteria–in the absence of mammalian keratinases, KOS gels do not degrade prematurely, but they are not fully resistant to proteolytic degradation either . With a slow and controllable rate of biodegradation, a well-engineered KOS scaffold can act as a good initial foundation for regenerative cells while allowing for a progressive clearance facilitating regeneration and axonal sprouting.…”
Section: Applications Of Keratin Hydrogel In Regenerative Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…137,138 Specifically, KOS fulfils the above-mentioned structural criteria−in the absence of mammalian keratinases, KOS gels do not degrade prematurely, but they are not fully resistant to proteolytic degradation either. 139 With a slow and controllable rate of biodegradation, a well-engineered KOS scaffold can act as a good initial foundation for regenerative cells while allowing for a progressive clearance facilitating regeneration and axonal sprouting. Moreover, as mentioned earlier, keratin biomaterials, like ECM, have binding domains for integrin receptors that enable the attachment of various cell types.…”
Section: Treating Peripheral Arterial Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17,25 Keratin biomaterial has the distinct advantage of being resistant to proteolytic degradation. 26 Therefore, keratin biomaterial forms a scaffold that persists in the nerve conduit and can be made to have a controlled degradation rate that is longer than other natural protein filler materials. However, the keratin scaffold can be remodeled by infiltrating cells and does not present an impediment to axonal regrowth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%