2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic distribution and dynamic variation of water under stress in middle and high rank coal samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the research object, there are two division schemes. In one division, T 2cutoff is taken as the cutoff point, and the slope is divided into fractal dimensions of movable water and bound water distribution. , In the other scheme, the T 2 values for small pores (adsorption pores) and large pores (seepage pores) are taken as the dividing point, and the slope is divided into fractal dimensions of small pores and large pores. ,,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to the research object, there are two division schemes. In one division, T 2cutoff is taken as the cutoff point, and the slope is divided into fractal dimensions of movable water and bound water distribution. , In the other scheme, the T 2 values for small pores (adsorption pores) and large pores (seepage pores) are taken as the dividing point, and the slope is divided into fractal dimensions of small pores and large pores. ,,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other set q – D ( q ) is introduced from the perspective of the information theory and called the generalized fractal dimension. A detailed description can be seen in Zhang et al …”
Section: Experimental Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The T 2 spectra of all coal samples at a water pressure of 15 MPa are shown in Figure 9. Zhang et al 15 and Zou et al 18 classified the pore-fracture system into adsorption pores (0−10 2 nm, T 2 < 2.5 ms), seepage pores (10 2 −10 4 nm, 2.5 ms < T 2 < 50 ms), and fractures (>10 4 nm, T 2 > 100 ms) using the T 2 spectrum and the response characteristics (relaxation time) of different pore diameters. This work refers to the division scheme given in the study of Yao et al, 17 with the classification of adsorption pores, seepage pores, and fractures based on the T 2 spectrum.…”
Section: Energy and Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%