2007
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.75.013811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic derivation of the Jaynes-Cummings model with cavity losses

Abstract: In this paper we provide a microscopic derivation of the master equation for the Jaynes-Cummings model with cavity losses. We single out both the differences with the phenomenological master equation used in the literature and the approximations under which the phenomenological model correctly describes the dynamics of the atom-cavity system. Some examples wherein the phenomenological and the microscopic master equations give rise to different predictions are discussed in detail.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
185
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
185
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This surprising result is obtained by applying a recently proposed measure of non-Markovianity [20,21] to two quite commonly used non-local master equations: The generalized memory kernel master equation discussed by one of us [7] and the post-Markovian Shabani-Lidar master equation [10], both used to study the time-evolution of a spin 1/2 in a thermal bath. Our results are connected to the issue of phenomenological vs. microscopically derived master equations in quantum optics which do not always produce coinciding results in all of the relevant parameter regimes [24]. Here we show that there can be also qualitative differences in addition to the quantitative ones when the two approaches are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This surprising result is obtained by applying a recently proposed measure of non-Markovianity [20,21] to two quite commonly used non-local master equations: The generalized memory kernel master equation discussed by one of us [7] and the post-Markovian Shabani-Lidar master equation [10], both used to study the time-evolution of a spin 1/2 in a thermal bath. Our results are connected to the issue of phenomenological vs. microscopically derived master equations in quantum optics which do not always produce coinciding results in all of the relevant parameter regimes [24]. Here we show that there can be also qualitative differences in addition to the quantitative ones when the two approaches are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Such term always appears if one wishes to preserve the form of the von Neumann equation in a time-dependent unitary transformation. After the transformation, the derivation of the master equation proceeds in a conventional manner [50][51][52] : We assume that the initial state of the total system is uncorrelated, i.e.,ρð0Þ 1 ρ S ð0Þ ρ E ð0Þ, and that the bath is in a thermal state, described byρ E ð0Þ, throughout the temporal evolution. We consider only weak coupling to the environment and apply the standard Born and Markov approximations in the interaction picture, and subsequently trace over the environmental degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second source of dissipation corresponds to the spontaneous emission of photons by the atom, however this kind of loss we consider small and neglect in the model. Following the common procedures [18,19], one obtains the MME for the system's reduced density operator ρ(t)…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the coupling constants and the atom-cavity detuning will be varied in order to search the optimal result. We must mention here that to satisfy the RWA we should have 2g ≫ γ max (ω) [18]. Satisfying this condition we start with the case g 1 = g 2 ≡ g = ν = 5γ, considering all the reservoirs at the same temperature, T , and study how the atomic entanglement evolves as a function of the atom-cavity detuning, ∆.…”
Section: Measuring the Quantum Correlations A Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 99%