2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40962-016-0120-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic Characterization of Different Shrinkage Defects in Ductile Irons and their Relation with Composition and Inoculation Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2), the lower is the inoculation the lower would be the risk of shrinkage formation. This conclusion is not contradictory with previous reports showing the beneficial effect of inoculation in decreasing shrinkage [4,8] as it should be pointed out that these earlier works compared inoculated to non-inoculated alloys. The present results show that inoculation is expected to decrease shrinkage tendency whereas over-inoculation appears to be detrimental.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2), the lower is the inoculation the lower would be the risk of shrinkage formation. This conclusion is not contradictory with previous reports showing the beneficial effect of inoculation in decreasing shrinkage [4,8] as it should be pointed out that these earlier works compared inoculated to non-inoculated alloys. The present results show that inoculation is expected to decrease shrinkage tendency whereas over-inoculation appears to be detrimental.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Regordosa and Llorca-Isern [4] reported that shrinkage porosity obtained in hypoeutectic and hypereutectic inoculated alloys differs in extent and characteristics. Pipe (open macroshrinkage), caved surfaces and internal macroshrinkage were detected in case of hypoeutectic alloys while only internal macroshrinkage with smaller size was present in hypereutectic alloys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many research and foundry experiments were performed to find the most important influencing factors favourable for shrinkage and micro-shrinkage formation to avoid this frequent defect in metal castings production. In this respect, different factors were identified, such as the chemistry of a treated cast iron (Compositional factor -C+1/7Si, Mg res , minor elements), mold features (rigidity/deformability, hardness stability), casting geometry (section modulus, feeding path), charge and melting practice (steel scrap/pig iron ratio, superheating level), pouring temperature, and inoculation treatment (type and amount of inoculant, nodule count) [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] .…”
Section: Special Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these defects can be only partly avoided through the optimization of the production process. For example, it was found that adjusted post-inoculation could decrease the dimensions of microshrinkage porosities in heavy section castings [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%