2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10596-020-09992-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscale mechanical modeling of deformable geomaterials with dynamic contacts based on the numerical manifold method

Abstract: Micromechanical modeling of geomaterials is challenging because of the complex geometry of discontinuities and potentially large number of deformable material bodies that contact each other dynamically. In this study, we have developed a numerical approach for micromechanical analysis of deformable geomaterials with dynamic contacts. In our approach, we detect contacts among multiple blocks with arbitrary shapes, enforce different contact constraints for three different contact states of separated, bonded, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This example confirms a conclusion in the earlier paper by the authors (Hu and Rutqvist 2020b): the sequential evolution of geomaterials as responses to stress is motion, deformation and accumulation of high stress at local contacting areas (especially at sharp corners). In addition, through this example, we find the fact that the damage zone with softer material can accommodate larger deformations, and therefore, dominate contact evolution and redistribution of stress of a granular system toward a system with minimized porosity.…”
Section: Modeling a Grain Pack With A Cataclastic Deformation Zonesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This example confirms a conclusion in the earlier paper by the authors (Hu and Rutqvist 2020b): the sequential evolution of geomaterials as responses to stress is motion, deformation and accumulation of high stress at local contacting areas (especially at sharp corners). In addition, through this example, we find the fact that the damage zone with softer material can accommodate larger deformations, and therefore, dominate contact evolution and redistribution of stress of a granular system toward a system with minimized porosity.…”
Section: Modeling a Grain Pack With A Cataclastic Deformation Zonesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, a significant difference between these two types of calculations is that contact pairs and contact states can change more rapidly and significantly when the contact pairs are no longer straight lines as in discrete fracture networks. A recently published paper by the authors (Hu and Rutqvist 2020b) explained the challenges of capturing these features in detail and developed a rigorous model with multi-step contact calculations that tackled these challenges.…”
Section: Fractures At the Microscale: Asperities And Grainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on this dual‐mesh concept and global approximation, both continuous and discontinuous processes can be rigorously solved by flexibly defining functions of the physical covers. Benefited from these groundbreaking fundamentals, the authors have developed a number of models for analyzing flow and fully coupled hydro‐mechanical processes of fractured, granular, and porous media at different scales (Hu et al., 2016, Hu & Rutqvist, 2020b, 2020c; Hu, Rutqvist, & Wang, 2017; Hu, Wang, & Rutqvist, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first time, Hu and Rutqvist [3] developed a microscale mechanical model that can simulate dynamic contacts of deformable geomaterials. In their approach, separation, bonding, and slip between microscale material bodies can be simulated as well as tensile and/or shear failure at the grain boundaries.…”
Section: From Macroscale To Microscale Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%